Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081419›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Five actions for five people: emergency cesarean section protocol.

Paolo Mannella, Federica Pancetti, Andrea Giannini, Eleonora Russo, Magdalena Montt-Guevara, Tommaso Simoncini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paolo MannellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy. paolo.mannella@unipi.it.
Federica PancettiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy.
Andrea GianniniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy.
Eleonora RussoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy.
Magdalena Montt-GuevaraDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy.
Tommaso SimonciniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe scope of this work is to evaluate an operative protocol for emergency C-section to improve teamwork and reduce surgical setup time.

methodsSixty-six health care operators working together in the delivery ward (gynecologists, midwives, anesthesiologists) simulated an emergency scenario applying a "five actions for each operator" protocol. For each simulation, the decision to delivery interval was considered and the perception of each operator as a team worker was analyzed with specific tests.

resultsThe "five actions for five people" protocol significantly reduces the decision to delivery interval (p < 0.001) for emergency C-section. At the same time, a simple and codified scheme improves communication among team members, avoids overlapping roles. Indeed, all the operators become more aware of being helpful to the team (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe use of a standardized, simple, and immediately usable protocol improves the performance of the delivery room team in terms of the urgency and quality of the operator's participation in the event. Procedures of this type should be favored within emergency obstetric settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CEAVNO 19-01-23. Local ethical Committee (COMITATO ETICO REGIONALE PER LA SPERIMENTAZIONE CLINICA - Sezione autonoma Area Vasta Nord Ovest -CEAVNO) approved this study as simulation training study. All the operators participated voluntary during their working time.

Indexed as

MidwiferySimulation TrainingAnesthesiologistsAwarenessCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPatient Care TeamPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37081419
PMCPMC10116771
OpenAlexW4366598699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.