ArticleBMC gastroenterology2023
Novel chemokine related LncRNA signature correlates with the prognosis, immune landscape, and therapeutic sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell cancer.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laboratory blood parameters and machine learning for the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Immune-Related Long Non-Coding RNA Signature Determines Prognosis and Immunotherapeutic Coherence in Esophageal Cancer.Cancer informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is closely correlated with malignant biological characteristics and poor survival. Recently, chemokines have been reported to be involved in the progression of tumors, and they can also regulate the tumor microenvironment. However, it is unclear whether chemokine-related long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) affect the prognosis of ESCC.
methodsWe downloaded RNA-seq and clinical data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO database. Chemokine-related lncRNAs were screened by differential analysis and Pearson correlation analysis. Then, prognosis-related lncRNAs were screened by using univariate COX regression, and risk models were constructed after the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate COX regression. The predictive value of the signature was assessed using Kaplan-Meier test, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curve. Moreover, a nomogram to predict patients' 1-year 3-year and 5-year prognosis was constructed. Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA), Gene Ontology/Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (GO/KEGG), evaluation of immune cell infiltration, and estimation of drug sensitivity were also conducted.
resultsIn this study, 677 chemokine-related lncRNAs were first obtained by differential analysis and Pearson correlation. Then, six chemokine-related lncRNAs were obtained by using univariate COX, LASSO and multivariate COX to construct a novel chemokine-related lncRNAs risk model. The signature manifested favorable predictive validity and accuracy both in the testing and training cohorts. The chemokine-related signature could classify ESCC patients into two risk groups well, which indicated that high-risk group exhibited poor prognostic outcome. In addition, this risk model played an important role in predicting signaling pathways, immune cell infiltration, stromal score, and drug sensitivity in ESCC patients.
conclusionsThese findings elucidated the critical role of novel prognostic chemokine-related lncRNAs in prognosis, immune landscape, and drug therapy, thus throwing light on prognostic evaluation and therapeutic targets for ESCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.