Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081322›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2023

Relationship between Proclarix and the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.

Miriam Campistol, Marina Triquell, Lucas Regis, Ana Celma, Inés de Torres, María E Semidey, Richard Mast, Olga Mendez, Jacques Planas, Enrique Trilla and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam CampistolDepartment of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. Miriam.campistol@vallhebron.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-3473
Marina TriquellDepartment of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Lucas RegisDepartment of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana CelmaDepartment of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Inés de TorresProstate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
María E SemideyProstate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Richard MastDepartment of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Olga MendezProstate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Jacques PlanasDepartment of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique Trilla *Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan Morote *Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESHebron University · PS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProclarix is a CE-marked test that provides the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), ranging from 0% to 100%, based on the serum measurement of Thrombospondin-1, cathepsin D, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percentage of free PSA in addition to age. We hypothesize that Proclarix could be correlated with PCa aggressiveness. We analyzed the association of this new biomarker with four surrogates of aggressiveness: grade group (GG) in the biopsy, clinical stage, risk of biochemical recurrence after primary treatment of localized PCa, and pathology in the surgical specimen. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a retrospective study from 606 men with suspicion of PCa [PSA of ≥ 3.0 ng/mL and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE)], in whom Proclarix was assessed (0-100%). The GG was defined by the International Society of Urological Pathology categories. The TNM was used for clinical staging (cT based on DRE, whereas cN and cM were established with computed tomography and 99-technetium bone scintigraphy). The risk of biochemical recurrence of localized PCa after primary treatment was defined by combining PSA, GG, and cT. Finally, an unfavorable pathology in a surgical specimen was defined as GG > 2 or pT ≥ 3.

resultsThe median age of the cohort was 67 years old, with a median PSA of 7 ng/mL and a rate of abnormal DRE of 23.3%. CsPCa was detected in 254 men (41.9%), with a median Proclarix of 60.1% compared with 37.3% obtained in patients with insignificant PCa and 20.7% in men without PCa. Among patients with GG > 3, Proclarix was significantly higher (58.2%) than in those with GG of 3 or lower (33.1%, p < 0.001). Men with localized tumors exhibited a Proclarix median of 37.3% compared with those with advanced disease (60.1%, p < 0.001). Proclarix levels among 197 patients with low and intermediate risk of biochemical recurrence were 24.9% and 35.0%, respectively, significantly lower compared with patients with high-risk disease (58.7%, p < 0.001). Unfavorable pathology was observed in 35 patients out of the 79 who underwent radical prostatectomy, with a Proclarix median of 35.7% compared with 23.7% obtained in patients with favorable pathology (p = 0.013). Proclarix and magnetic resonance imaging were independent predictors of the four surrogates of aggressiveness analyzed.

conclusionThere is a correlation between Proclarix and the aggressiveness of PCa.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyHumansMaleProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37081322
OpenAlexW4366465762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.