Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081309›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2023

A Systematic Evaluation of Cost-Saving Dosing Regimens for Therapeutic Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Lung Cancer.

Rob Ter Heine, Michel M van den Heuvel, Berber Piet, Maarten J Deenen, Anthonie J van der Wekken, Lizza E L Hendriks, Sander Croes, Robin M J M van Geel, Frank G A Jansman, Rogier C Boshuizen and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Rob Ter HeineDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.terheine@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-8201
Michel M van den HeuvelDepartment of Pulmonology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Berber PietDepartment of Pulmonology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maarten J DeenenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Anthonie J van der WekkenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lizza E L HendriksDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sander CroesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robin M J M van GeelDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frank G A JansmanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Rogier C BoshuizenDepartment of Pulmonology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Eric J F FranssenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital AC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthur A J SmitDepartment of Pulmonology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital AC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daphne W DumoulinDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thijs H Oude MunninkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Egbert F SmitDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hieronymus J DerijksDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cor H van der LeestDepartment of Pulmonology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J M A HendrikxDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk J A R MoesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nikki de RouwDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University · NLLeiden University · NLOLVG · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpensive novel anticancer drugs put a serious strain on healthcare budgets, and the associated drug expenses limit access to life-saving treatments worldwide.

objectiveWe aimed to develop alternative dosing regimens to reduce drug expenses.

methodsWe developed alternative dosing regimens for the following monoclonal antibodies used for the treatment of lung cancer: amivantamab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ramucirumab; and for the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan. The alternative dosing regimens were developed by means of modeling and simulation based on the population pharmacokinetic models developed by the license holders. They were based on weight bands and the administration of complete vials to limit drug wastage. The resulting dosing regimens were developed to comply with criteria used by regulatory authorities for in silico dose development.

resultsWe found that alternative dosing regimens could result in cost savings that range from 11 to 28%, and lead to equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure with no relevant increases in variability in exposure.

conclusionsDosing regimens based on weight bands and the use of complete vials to reduce drug wastage result in less expenses while maintaining equivalent exposure. The level of evidence of our proposal is the same as accepted by regulatory authorities for the approval of alternative dosing regimens of other monoclonal antibodies in oncology. The proposed alternative dosing regimens can, therefore, be directly implemented in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansNivolumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID37081309
PMCPMC10192147
OpenAlexW4366547665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.