Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081293›Full record

ReviewGenes & genomics2023

Forensic biogeographical ancestry inference: recent insights and current trends.

Yufeng Wen, Jing Liu, Yonglin Su, Xiacan Chen, Yiping Hou, Linchuan Liao, Zheng Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigation ofTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024
    Article
  7. Current issues in forensic genetics.Genes & genomics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yufeng WenKey Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100088, China.
Jing Liu *Institute of Forensic Medicine, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yonglin SuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xiacan ChenInstitute of Forensic Medicine, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yiping HouInstitute of Forensic Medicine, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Linchuan LiaoInstitute of Forensic Medicine, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. linchuanliao@scu.edu.cn.
Zheng WangKey Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100088, China. wangzhengtim@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-1741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a powerful complement to the paradigmatic DNA profiling strategy, biogeographical ancestry inference (BGAI) plays a significant part in human forensic investigation especially when a database hit or eyewitness testimony are not available. It indicates one's biogeographical profile based on known population-specific genetic variations, and thus is crucial for guiding authority investigations to find unknown individuals. Forensic biogeographical ancestry testing exploits much of the recent advances in the understanding of human genomic variation and improving of molecular biology.

objectiveIn this review, recent development of prospective ancestry informative markers (AIMs) and the statistical approaches of inferring biogeographic ancestry from AIMs are elucidated and discussed.

methodsWe highlight the research progress of three potential AIMs (i.e., single nucleotide polymorphisms, microhaplotypes, and Y or mtDNA uniparental markers) and discuss the prospects and challenges of two methods that are commonly used in BGAI.

conclusionWhile BGAI for forensic purposes has been thriving in recent years, important challenges, such as ethics and responsibilities, data completeness, and ununified standards for evaluation, remain for the use of biogeographical ancestry information in human forensic investigations. To address these issues and fully realize the value of BGAI in forensic investigation, efforts should be made not only by labs/institutions around the world independently, but also by inter-lab/institution collaborations.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsDNA, MitochondrialHumansProspective StudiesDNA, MitochondrialAncestry informative markersBiogeographical ancestry inferenceForensic geneticsPopulation structure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.