ReviewNature biomedical engineering2023
Translational opportunities and challenges of invasive electrodes for neural interfaces.
Review in Nature biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional material platforms for neural interfaces: active orchestration of dynamic foreign body response across implantation lifetimes.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- A soft bioelectronic system with a responsive hydrogel neural interface for direct force quantification and real-time intraoperative craniocerebral injury monitoring.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Real-time, cross-modal genotype mapping of free-movingScience advances · 2026Article
- An Event based Body Coupled Transdural Telemetry for Intracortical Brain Computer Interfaces.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Skin Relevant Biomaterials from Wound Healing, Medical Aesthetics, Flexible Electronics to Artificial Intelligence and Beyond.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- High-Sensitivity AlGaN/GaN HFET Implantable Neural Probe Without Gate Control Enabled by Photoelectrochemical Etching.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Full-Stack Architectures for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Laminar organization of cellular microcircuits modulating human interictal epileptiform discharges.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Temporally Delayed Deployment of Photo-Responsive Liquid Crystal Polymer Networks Toward Neural Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Smart Nanotechnologies for Multimodal Neuromodulation and Brain Interfacing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Highly mechanically stable PEDOT:PSS/PDA-modified microelectrode arrays reveal state-specific dynamic neural activity across sleep-wake.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- A soft electrode array with reconfigurable hydrogel interfaces for high-fidelity neurophysiological monitoring during craniotomy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Integrating living biomaterials into neuroelectronic systems.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
- Advancing neuroengineering with Neuromorphic Twins.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Multi-Layer Brain-Mimicking Phantom for Replicating Dura and Pia Membrane Dimpling and Rupture Properties During Neural Interface Implantation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- PEDOT:PSS-A Key Material for Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Neural representations of visual memory in inferotemporal cortex reveal a generalizable framework for translating between spikes and field potentials.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- EEG-timed neuromuscular stimulation shapes ipsilateral TMS-evoked motor responses in humans.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Ethical imperatives in the commercialization of brain-computer interfaces.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive brain-machine interfaces can restore motor, sensory and cognitive functions. However, their clinical adoption has been hindered by the surgical risk of implantation and by suboptimal long-term reliability. In this Review, we highlight the opportunities and challenges of invasive technology for clinically relevant electrophysiology. Specifically, we discuss the characteristics of neural probes that are most likely to facilitate the clinical translation of invasive neural interfaces, describe the neural signals that can be acquired or produced by intracranial electrodes, the abiotic and biotic factors that contribute to their failure, and emerging neural-interface architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37081142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.