Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081121›Full record

ArticleISME communications2023

Ecological insights into soil health according to the genomic traits and environment-wide associations of bacteria in agricultural soils.

Roland C Wilhelm, Joseph P Amsili, Kirsten S M Kurtz, Harold M van Es, Daniel H Buckley

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biodiversity isn't measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role of horizontal gene transfer and cooperation in rhizosphere microbiome assembly.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roland C WilhelmSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. rwilhelm@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1170-1753
Joseph P AmsiliSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Kirsten S M KurtzSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Harold M van EsSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Daniel H BuckleySchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture (United States Department of Agriculture) 69-3A75-16-039U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0016364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbiomes are sensitive to current and previous soil conditions, and bacterial 'bioindicators' of biological, physical, and chemical soil properties have considerable potential for soil health assessment. However, the lack of ecological or physiological information for most soil microorganisms limits our ability to interpret the associations of bioindicators and, thus, their utility for guiding management. We identified bioindicators of tillage intensity and twelve soil properties used to rate soil health using a 16S rRNA gene-based survey of farmland across North America. We then inferred the genomic traits of bioindicators and evaluated their environment-wide associations (EWAS) with respect to agricultural management practice, disturbance, and plant associations with 89 studies from agroecosystems. Most bioindicators were either positively correlated with biological properties (e.g., organic matter) or negatively correlated with physical and chemical properties. Higher soil health ratings corresponded with smaller genome size and higher coding density, while lower ratings corresponded with larger genomes and higher rrn copy number. Community-weighted genome size explained most variation in health ratings. EWAS linked prominent bioindicators with the impacts of environmental disturbances. Our findings provide ecological insights into bioindicators of soil properties relevant to soil health management, illustrating the tight coupling of microbiome and soil function.

Identifiers

PMID37081121
PMCPMC9829723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.