Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081099›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2023

Multiplexing working memory and time in the trajectories of neural networks.

Shanglin Zhou, Michael Seay, Jiannis Taxidis, Peyman Golshani, Dean V Buonomano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robustness of Working Memory to Prefrontal Cortex Microstimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Robustness of working memory to prefrontal cortex microstimulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Timescales of learning in prefrontal cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  10. Hamiltonian energy in a modified Hindmarsh-Rose model.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Time for Memories.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shanglin Zhou *Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-615X
Michael Seay *Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jiannis TaxidisProgram in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peyman GolshaniDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-7695
Dean V BuonomanoDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. dbuono@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-9231

Funding

Multiplexing working memory and timing: Encoding retrospective and prospective information in transient neural trajectories.RF1NS116589 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V, GOLSHANI, PEYMAN · 2020 to 2020
$1.8M
Multiplexing working memory and timing: Encoding retrospective and prospective information in transient neural trajectories.R01NS116589 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V, GOLSHANI, PEYMAN · 2023 to 2024
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116589NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS116589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) and timing are generally considered distinct cognitive functions, but similar neural signatures have been implicated in both. To explore the hypothesis that WM and timing may rely on shared neural mechanisms, we used psychophysical tasks that contained either task-irrelevant timing or WM components. In both cases, the task-irrelevant component influenced performance. We then developed recurrent neural network (RNN) simulations that revealed that cue-specific neural sequences, which multiplexed WM and time, emerged as the dominant regime that captured the behavioural findings. During training, RNN dynamics transitioned from low-dimensional ramps to high-dimensional neural sequences, and depending on task requirements, steady-state or ramping activity was also observed. Analysis of RNN structure revealed that neural sequences relied primarily on inhibitory connections, and could survive the deletion of all excitatory-to-excitatory connections. Our results indicate that in some instances WM is encoded in time-varying neural activity because of the importance of predicting when WM will be used.

Indexed as

CognitionMemory, Short-TermHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37081099
PMCPMC10913811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.