Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081054›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Human microbiome transfer in the built environment differs based on occupants, objects, and buildings.

Andrew J Hoisington, Christopher E Stamper, Katherine L Bates, Maggie A Stanislawski, Michael C Flux, Teodor T Postolache, Christopher A Lowry, Lisa A Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew J HoisingtonVeterans Health Administration, Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMRVAMC), VISN 19, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. andrew.hoisington@va.gov.
Christopher E StamperVeterans Health Administration, Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMRVAMC), VISN 19, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Katherine L BatesDepartment of Biology, US Air Force Academy, USAF Academy, CO, 80840, USA.
Maggie A StanislawskiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Michael C FluxDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Teodor T PostolacheVeterans Health Administration, Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMRVAMC), VISN 19, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Christopher A LowryVeterans Health Administration, Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMRVAMC), VISN 19, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Lisa A BrennerVeterans Health Administration, Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMRVAMC), VISN 19, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Funding

The Contribution of Omic Profiles to Weight Loss and ObesityK01HL157658 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Maggie A Stanislawski · 2022 to 2026
$794k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to microbiomes on other skin sites, the bacterial microbiome of the human hand has been found to have greater variability across time. To increase understanding regarding the longitudinal transfer of the hand microbiome to objects in the built environment, and vice versa, 22 participants provided skin microbiome samples from their dominant hands, as well as from frequently and infrequently touched objects in their office environments. Additional longitudinal samples from home environments were obtained from a subset of 11 participants. We observed stability of the microbiomes of both the hand and built environments within the office and home settings; however, differences in the microbial communities were detected across the two built environments. Occupants' frequency of touching an object correlated to that object having a higher relative abundance of human microbes, yet the percent of shared microbes was variable by participants. Finally, objects that were horizontal surfaces in the built environment had higher microbial diversity as compared to objects and the occupants' hands. This study adds to the existing knowledge of microbiomes of the built environment, enables more detailed studies of indoor microbial transfer, and contributes to future models and building interventions to reduce negative outcomes and improve health and well-being.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBuilt EnvironmentHumansSkin

Identifiers

PMID37081054
PMCPMC10116103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.