Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Micro-computed tomography for the identification and characterization of archaeological lime bark.

Jörg Stelzner, Sebastian Million, Ingrid Stelzner, Oliver Nelle, Johanna Banck-Burgess

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jörg StelznerLeibniz-Zentrum für Archäologie, Ludwig-Lindenschmit-Forum 1, 55116, Mainz, Germany. joerg.stelzner@leiza.de.
Sebastian MillionLandesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Fischersteig 9, 78343, Gaienhofen-Hemmenhofen, Germany.
Ingrid StelznerLeibniz-Zentrum für Archäologie, Ludwig-Lindenschmit-Forum 1, 55116, Mainz, Germany.
Oliver NelleLandesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Fischersteig 9, 78343, Gaienhofen-Hemmenhofen, Germany.
Johanna Banck-BurgessLandesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Berliner Straße 12, 73728, Esslingen am Neckar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Neolithic pile-dwelling settlements of southwestern Germany, bark played a prominent role in the production of technical textiles. So far, the inner bark (phloem) of the lime tree (genus Tilia) could be detected most frequently. Microscopic examination of anatomical features can determine the taxon, requiring manipulation of samples and archaeological objects. In this study, micro-computed tomography (µCT) was reviewed as a method for determining the woody taxon and obtaining additional information from the inner bark. To this end, modern bark samples from different tree organs of lime were first analysed using both µCT and transmitted light microscopy. Both methods were able to detect all characteristic anatomical features in the phloem and identify the genus. With analysis based on µCT data, further anatomical information can be obtained. For example, the shape of the phloem rays in the bast strips can provide information on the position within the bark and on the original organ diameter. These results obtained on modern material were verified on four samples from archaeological objects. Based on µCT, all samples could be clearly identified as lime and in two cases conclusions could also be drawn about the raw material. This approach could lead to new results and interpretations in archaeological sciences.

Indexed as

PhloemPlant BarkCalcium CompoundsOxidesTreesWoodX-Ray MicrotomographyCalcium CompoundslimeOxides

Identifiers

PMID37081053
PMCPMC10119129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.