Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Evaluation of infliximab/tocilizumab versus tocilizumab among COVID-19 patients with cytokine storm syndrome.

Neven Mohamed Sarhan, Ahmed Essam Abou Warda, Haytham Soliman Ghareeb Ibrahim, Mona Farag Schaalan, Shaimaa Mohamed Fathy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04734678 (Comparison of Tocilizumab Versus Tocilizumab/Infliximab in Patients With COVID-19-associated Cytokine Storm Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04734678 completednot on this map

Comparison of Tocilizumab Versus Tocilizumab/Infliximab in Patients With COVID-19-associated Cytokine Storm Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled153ConditionsCovid19, Cytokine Storm, Corona Virus InfectionArmsTocilizumab, Infliximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neven Mohamed SarhanClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt. nevine.mohamed@miuegypt.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-5518
Ahmed Essam Abou WardaClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, October 6 University, Giza, 12585, Egypt.
Haytham Soliman Ghareeb IbrahimCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, El-Fayoum University, El-Fayoum, Egypt.
Mona Farag SchaalanClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Shaimaa Mohamed FathyClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, October 6 University, Giza, 12585, Egypt.
Misr International University · EGOctober 6 University · EGFayoum University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread rapidly. Monoclonal antibodies as well as anti-tumor necrosis factor are considered promising treatments for COVID-19. A prospective cohort study in which patients are divided into three groups. Group 1: moderate and severe COVID-19 patients received standard treatment; Group 2: moderate and severe COVID-19 patients received tocilizumab; Group 3: moderate and severe COVID-19 patients received treatment with infliximab and tocilizumab. 153 patients were recruited in the study. 40 received standard treatment alone, 70 received tocilizumab with standard treatment, and 43 received tocilizumab/infliximab with standard treatment. There was a significant difference in length of hospital stay (10.3, 8.9, and 7.6 days respectively P = 0.03), need for a non-invasive mechanical ventilator (4, 5, and one patient; P = 1.2E-8), intensive care admission (32, 45, and 16 patients; P = 2.5E-5), the occurrence of sepsis (18, 12, and 10 patients; P = 0.005) and in death (42.5%, 14.2%, and 7%; P = 0.0008) which were significantly lower in tocilizumab/infliximab group compared to tocilizumab and standard of care groups. Our study showed that tocilizumab/ infliximab in addition to standard of care was considered a promising treatment for moderate and severe COVID-19 patients.Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04734678; date of registration: 02/02/2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentCytokine Release SyndromeHumansInfliximabProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInfliximabtocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID37081046
PMCPMC10116445
OpenAlexW4366590050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.