ArticleScientific reports2023
Effect of green and roasted coffee storage conditions on selected characteristic quality parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved food storage in jute packaging: an assessment of the current uses, constraints, and functional enhancements of jute bags and the potential of nonconventional jute-based paper packaging.Journal of food science and technology · 2025Review
- Effect of Temperature and Storage on Coffee's Volatile Compound Profile and Sensory Characteristics.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of GC-TOF/MS and GC×GC-TOF/MS to Discriminate Coffee Products in Three States (Bean, Powder, and Brew).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper attempts to determine the best storage conditions for green and roasted coffee beans. Coffee beans were processed in various ways-some of them were washed or left in their natural state after harvesting, then they were stored in two types of packaging with different permeability, i.e. jute bag and GrainPro polymer bag, ensuring stable conditions in three temperature chambers, i.e. - 10, 10 and 20 °C. The grains treated in this way were evaluated after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The selection of the analyzed parameters (in roasted coffee-cupping and 3 selected volatile organic compounds; in green coffee-average water activity, content of volatile fatty acids, 6 selected volatile organic compounds) was to monitor the ongoing processes, and thus the qualitative changes taking place in grains. The research shows that grain stored at 20 °C ages the fastest. Grains stored in - 10 °C and 10 °C chambers perform similarly well. The evaluation of the parameters shows that among the grains stored in these two chambers, the method of grain processing (Natural/Washed) had a greater impact on the results, while the type of packaging did not differentiate the grains to such a significant extent.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.