Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37080981›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Accelerated biological aging and risk of depression and anxiety: evidence from 424,299 UK Biobank participants.

Xu Gao, Tong Geng, Meijie Jiang, Ninghao Huang, Yinan Zheng, Daniel W Belsky, Tao Huang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 170 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mental health disparities in LGBTQIA+ populations: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xu GaoDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. xu.gao@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6506-6084
Tong GengPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Meijie JiangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ninghao HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yinan ZhengDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-7320
Daniel W BelskyDepartment of Epidemiology & Butler Columbia Aging Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. db3275@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-2212
Tao HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0328-1368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory predicts that biological processes of aging may contribute to poor mental health in late life. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated prospective associations between biological age and incident depression and anxiety in 424,299 UK Biobank participants. We measured biological age from clinical traits using the KDM-BA and PhenoAge algorithms. At baseline, participants who were biologically older more often experienced depression/anxiety. During a median of 8.7 years of follow-up, participants with older biological age were at increased risk of incident depression/anxiety (5.9% increase per standard deviation [SD] of KDM-BA acceleration, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 3.3%-8.5%; 11.3% increase per SD of PhenoAge acceleration, 95% CI: 9.%-13.0%). Biological-aging-associated risk of depression/anxiety was independent of and additive to genetic risk measured by genome-wide-association-study-based polygenic scores. Advanced biological aging may represent a potential risk factor for incident depression/anxiety in midlife and older adults and a potential target for risk assessment and intervention.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksDepressionAgedAgingAnxietyHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID37080981
PMCPMC10119095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.