ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023
TripletCell: a deep metric learning framework for accurate annotation of cell types at the single-cell level.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- A message passing framework for precise cell state identification with scClassify2.Genome biology · 2025Article
- PhytoCluster: a generative deep learning model for clustering plant single-cell RNA-seq data.aBIOTECH · 2025Article
- An overview of computational methods in single-cell transcriptomic cell type annotation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Mapping Cell Identity from scRNA-seq: A primer on computational methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- PRITrans: A Transformer-Based Approach for the Prediction of the Effects of Missense Mutation on Protein-RNA Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- CTISL: a dynamic stacking multi-class classification approach for identifying cell types from single-cell RNA-seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has significantly accelerated the experimental characterization of distinct cell lineages and types in complex tissues and organisms. Cell-type annotation is of great importance in most of the scRNA-seq analysis pipelines. However, manual cell-type annotation heavily relies on the quality of scRNA-seq data and marker genes, and therefore can be laborious and time-consuming. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of scRNA-seq datasets poses another challenge for accurate cell-type annotation, such as the batch effect induced by different scRNA-seq protocols and samples. To overcome these limitations, here we propose a novel pipeline, termed TripletCell, for cross-species, cross-protocol and cross-sample cell-type annotation. We developed a cell embedding and dimension-reduction module for the feature extraction (FE) in TripletCell, namely TripletCell-FE, to leverage the deep metric learning-based algorithm for the relationships between the reference gene expression matrix and the query cells. Our experimental studies on 21 datasets (covering nine scRNA-seq protocols, two species and three tissues) demonstrate that TripletCell outperformed state-of-the-art approaches for cell-type annotation. More importantly, regardless of protocols or species, TripletCell can deliver outstanding and robust performance in annotating different types of cells. TripletCell is freely available at https://github.com/liuyan3056/TripletCell. We believe that TripletCell is a reliable computational tool for accurately annotating various cell types using scRNA-seq data and will be instrumental in assisting the generation of novel biological hypotheses in cell biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.