Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37080721›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation.

A Avesta, Y Hui, M Aboian, J Duncan, H M Krumholz, S Aneja

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Attention-gated 3D CapsNet for robust hippocampal segmentation.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

A AvestaFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.A., M.A., J.D.).ORCID 0000-0002-6847-9818
Y HuiDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology (A.A., Y.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-2668-5151
M AboianFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.A., M.A., J.D.).ORCID 0000-0002-4877-8271
J DuncanFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.A., M.A., J.D.).
H M KrumholzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (A.A., Y.H., H.M.K., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-2046-127X
S AnejaDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology (A.A., Y.H., S.A.) sanjay.aneja@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5681-7528
Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale · FRYale University · USAnna Needs Neuroblastoma Answers · USSana'a University · YE

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001862 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001862NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCurrent autosegmentation models such as UNets and nnUNets have limitations, including the inability to segment images that are not represented during training and lack of computational efficiency. 3D capsule networks have the potential to address these limitations. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used 3430 brain MRIs, acquired in a multi-institutional study, to train and validate our models. We compared our capsule network with standard alternatives, UNets and nnUNets, on the basis of segmentation efficacy (Dice scores), segmentation performance when the image is not well-represented in the training data, performance when the training data are limited, and computational efficiency including required memory and computational speed.

resultsThe capsule network segmented the third ventricle, thalamus, and hippocampus with Dice scores of 95%, 94%, and 92%, respectively, which were within 1% of the Dice scores of UNets and nnUNets. The capsule network significantly outperformed UNets in segmenting images that were not well-represented in the training data, with Dice scores 30% higher. The computational memory required for the capsule network is less than one-tenth of the memory required for UNets or nnUNets. The capsule network is also >25% faster to train compared with UNet and nnUNet.

conclusionsWe developed and validated a capsule network that is effective in segmenting brain images, can segment images that are not well-represented in the training data, and is computationally efficient compared with alternatives.

Indexed as

BrainThird VentricleHippocampusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID37080721
PMCPMC10171390
OpenAlexW4366588666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.