ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023
3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning based volumetric analysis of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms characterized on CTA.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Capsule Neural Networks with Bayesian Optimization for Pediatric Pneumonia Detection from Chest X-Ray Images.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Emerging Trends in Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- DualPlaqueNet with dual-branch structure and attention mechanism for carotid plaque semantic segmentation and size prediction.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Improved localization and segmentation of spinal bone metastases in MRI with nnUNet radiomics.Journal of bone oncology · 2024Article
- Cascade Residual Multiscale Convolution and Mamba-Structured UNet for Advanced Brain Tumor Image Segmentation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Attention-gated 3D CapsNet for robust hippocampal segmentation.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Auto-Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeCurrent autosegmentation models such as UNets and nnUNets have limitations, including the inability to segment images that are not represented during training and lack of computational efficiency. 3D capsule networks have the potential to address these limitations. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used 3430 brain MRIs, acquired in a multi-institutional study, to train and validate our models. We compared our capsule network with standard alternatives, UNets and nnUNets, on the basis of segmentation efficacy (Dice scores), segmentation performance when the image is not well-represented in the training data, performance when the training data are limited, and computational efficiency including required memory and computational speed.
resultsThe capsule network segmented the third ventricle, thalamus, and hippocampus with Dice scores of 95%, 94%, and 92%, respectively, which were within 1% of the Dice scores of UNets and nnUNets. The capsule network significantly outperformed UNets in segmenting images that were not well-represented in the training data, with Dice scores 30% higher. The computational memory required for the capsule network is less than one-tenth of the memory required for UNets or nnUNets. The capsule network is also >25% faster to train compared with UNet and nnUNet.
conclusionsWe developed and validated a capsule network that is effective in segmenting brain images, can segment images that are not well-represented in the training data, and is computationally efficient compared with alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.