Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37080425›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2023

Understanding the encoding of object locations in small-scale spaces during free exploration using eye tracking.

Alana Muller, Joshua D Garren, Kayla Cao, Mary A Peterson, Arne D Ekstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alana MullerDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. Electronic address: amuller@arizona.edu.
Joshua D GarrenDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. Electronic address: joshuadgarren@arizona.edu.
Kayla CaoDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. Electronic address: kaylacao@arizona.edu.
Mary A PetersonDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA; Evelyn McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA; Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. Electronic address: mapeters@arizona.edu.
Arne D EkstromDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA; Evelyn McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. Electronic address: adekstrom@arizona.edu.

Funding

NEUROBEHAVIORAL RELATIONS IN SENESCENT HIPPOCAMPUSR01AG003376 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 1985 to 2025
$16.4M
Representation of spatiotemporal information in human episodic memory and navigationR01NS076856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARNE D EKSTROM · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
Precision and binding as two dimensions of medial temporal lobe amnesiaR01NS114913 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI EKSTROM, ARNE D, YONELINAS, ANDREW P · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG003376NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076856NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navigation is instrumental to daily life and is often used to encode and locate objects, such as keys in one's house. Yet, little is known about how navigation works in more ecologically valid situations such as finding objects within a room. Specifically, it is not clear how vision vs. body movements contribute differentially to spatial memory in such small-scale spaces. In the current study, participants encoded object locations by viewing them while standing (stationary condition) or by additionally being guided by the experimenter while blindfolded (walking condition) after viewing the objects. They then retrieved the objects from the same or different viewpoint, creating a 2 × 2 within subject design. We simultaneously recorded participant eye movements throughout the experiment using mobile eye tracking. The results showed no statistically significant differences among our four conditions (stationary, same viewpoint as encoding; stationary, different viewpoint; walking, same viewpoint; walking, different viewpoint), suggesting that in a small real-world space, vision may be sufficient to remember object locations. Eye tracking analyses revealed that object locations were better remembered next to landmarks and that participants encoded items on one wall together, suggesting the use of local wall coordinates rather than global room coordinates. A multivariate regression analysis revealed that the only significant predictor of object placement accuracy was average looking time. These results suggest that vision may be sufficient for encoding object locations in a small-scale environment and that such memories may be formed largely locally rather than globally.

Indexed as

Eye-Tracking TechnologyMental RecallEye MovementsHumansMovementSpace PerceptionSpatial MemoryEcological validityMobile eye trackingNavigationSpatial memory

Identifiers

PMID37080425
PMCPMC10289170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.