Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37080343›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2023

Modeling the drivers of oscillations in COVID-19 data on college campuses.

Ognyan Simeonov, Carrie Diaz Eaton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ognyan SimeonovDepartment of Mathematics, Bates College, Lewiston, ME. Electronic address: O.O.Simeonov@sms.ed.ac.uk.
Carrie Diaz EatonDepartment of Mathematics, Bates College, Lewiston, ME.
Bates College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncorporating human behavior in a disease model can explain the oscillations in COVID-19 data which occur more rapidly than can be explained by variants alone on college campuses.

methodsDampened oscillations emerge by supplementing a simple disease model with a risk assessment function, which depends on the current number of infected individuals in the student population and the institutional public health policies. After accounting for a rapid disease impulse due to social gatherings, we achieve sustained oscillations that follow the trend of 2020/2021 COVID-19 data as reported on the COVID-19 dashboards of US post-secondary institutions.

resultsThis adjustment to the epidemiological model can provide an intuitive way of understanding rapid oscillations based on human risk perception and institutional policies. More risk-averse communities experience lower disease-level equilibria and less oscillations within the system, while communities that are less responsive to changes in the number of infected individuals exhibit larger amplitude and frequency of the oscillations.

conclusionsCommunity risk assessment plays an important role in COVID-19 management in college settings. Improving the ability of individuals to rapidly and conservatively respond to changes in community disease levels may help assist in self-regulating these oscillations to levels well below thresholds for emergency management.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPublic HealthRisk AssessmentCOVID-19Disease modelingHuman behaviorOscillationsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37080343
PMCPMC10111870
OpenAlexW4366263367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.