Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37080235›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy2023

Artificial intelligence-based polyp size measurement in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the auxiliary waterjet as a reference.

Boban Sudarevic, Philipp Sodmann, Ioannis Kafetzis, Joel Troya, Thomas J Lux, Zita Saßmannshausen, Katja Herlod, Stefan A Schmidt, Markus Brand, Katrin Schöttker and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06040710 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Artificial-intelligence-based QUAntification of Size measuremeNts of Adenoma in Routine Endoscopy

TypeobservationalSponsorWuerzburg University HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled145ConditionsColorectal Polyp, Colorectal AdenomaArmsPOSEIDON size estimation software with the EndoMind polyp detection system
NCT06715384 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Performance Evaluation of a Computer-aided Measuring System for Colorectal Polyp Size Measurement: a Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled168ConditionsColorectal Polyp, Colorectal AdenomaArmsPolyp size measurement using autonomous AI measurement or AI-assisted human measurement with the CAM system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Boban SudarevicInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Philipp SodmannInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ioannis KafetzisInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Joel TroyaInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7992-0146
Thomas J LuxInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Zita SaßmannshausenInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Katja HerlodInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan A SchmidtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-4542
Markus BrandInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3495-5206
Katrin SchöttkerInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Wolfram G ZollerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Alexander MeiningInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Alexander HannInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-3559
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEKatharinenhospital · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

Bavarian Center for Cancer Research http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100022804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement of colorectal polyp size during endoscopy is mainly performed visually. In this work, we propose a novel polyp size measurement system (Poseidon) based on artificial intelligence (AI) using the auxiliary waterjet as a measurement reference.

methodsVisual estimation, biopsy forceps-based estimation, and Poseidon were compared using a computed tomography colonography-based silicone model with 28 polyps of defined sizes. Four experienced gastroenterologists estimated polyp sizes visually and with biopsy forceps. Furthermore, the gastroenterologists recorded images of each polyp with the waterjet in proximity for the application of Poseidon. Additionally, Poseidon's measurements of 29 colorectal polyps during routine clinical practice were compared with visual estimates.

resultsIn the silicone model, visual estimation had the largest median percentage error of 25.1 % (95 %CI 19.1 %-30.4 %), followed by biopsy forceps-based estimation: median 20.0 % (95 %CI 14.4 %-25.6 %). Poseidon gave a significantly lower median percentage error of 7.4 % (95 %CI 5.0 %-9.4 %) compared with other methods. During routine colonoscopies, Poseidon presented a significantly lower median percentage error (7.7 %, 95 %CI 6.1 %-9.3 %) than visual estimation (22.1 %, 95 %CI 15.1 %-26.9 %).

conclusionIn this work, we present a novel AI-based method for measuring colorectal polyp size with significantly higher accuracy than other common sizing methods.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonography, Computed TomographicColorectal NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceColonoscopyHumansSurgical Instruments

Identifiers

PMID37080235
PMCPMC10465238
OpenAlexW4366550188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.