Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079887›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Chemical Society2023

Iron Photoredox Catalysis-Past, Present, and Future.

Lisa H M de Groot, Aleksandra Ilic, Jesper Schwarz, Kenneth Wärnmark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synthetic Mechanism of a Fe(II)Inorganic chemistry · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of the Character of the Excited State of Singly Reduced RhJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chemical Upcycling of Polyphenylene Sulfide at Room Temperature.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa H M de GrootCentre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6148-2259
Aleksandra IlicCentre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5773-1742
Jesper SchwarzCentre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6031-3311
Kenneth WärnmarkCentre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9022-3165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoredox catalysis of organic reactions driven by iron has attracted substantial attention throughout recent years, due to potential environmental and economic benefits. In this Perspective, three major strategies were identified that have been employed to date to achieve reactivities comparable to the successful noble metal photoredox catalysis: (1) Direct replacement of a noble metal center by iron in archetypal polypyridyl complexes, resulting in a metal-centered photofunctional state. (2) In situ generation of photoactive complexes by substrate coordination where the reactions are driven via intramolecular electron transfer involving charge-transfer states, for example, through visible-light-induced homolysis. (3) Improving the excited-state lifetimes and redox potentials of the charge-transfer states of iron complexes through new ligand design. We seek to give an overview and evaluation of recent developments in this rapidly growing field and, at the same time, provide an outlook on the future of iron-based photoredox catalysis.

Identifiers

PMID37079887
PMCPMC10161236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.