Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079630›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand.

Preechaya Wongkrajang, Jiraphun Jittikoon, Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri, Pattarawalai Talungchit, Pornpimol Ruangvutilert, Tachjaree Panchalee, Usa Chaikledkaew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Preechaya WongkrajangFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Social, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4660-3961
Jiraphun JittikoonFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Biochemistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sermsiri SangroongruangsriFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Social Administrative Pharmacy Division, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pattarawalai TalungchitFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-8754
Pornpimol RuangvutilertFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4593-9727
Tachjaree PanchaleeFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Usa ChaikledkaewFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Social Administrative Pharmacy Division, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-9823
Siriraj Hospital · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated prenatal screening test performance and the prevalence of common aneuploidies at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. We collected data from screening tests which are first-trimester test, quadruple test, and noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) between January 2016 and December 2020. Thirty percent (7,860/25,736) of pregnancies received prenatal screening tests for aneuploidies disorders, and 17.8% underwent prenatal diagnosis tests without screening. The highest percentage of screening tests was first-trimester test (64.5%). The high-risk results were 4% for first-trimester test, 6.6% for quadruple test, and 1.3% for NIPT. The serum screening tests for trisomy 13 and 18 had no true positives; therefore, we could not calculate sensitivity. For the first-trimester test, the sensitivity for trisomy 21 was 71.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 30.3-94.9); specificity for trisomy 13 and 18 was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-99.9); and for trisomy 21 was 96.1% (95% CI 95.6-96.7). For the quadruple test, the specificity for trisomy 18 was 99.6% (95% CI 98.9-99.8), while the sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 were 50% (95% CI 26.7-97.3) and 93.9% (95% CI 92.2-95.3), respectively. NIPT had 100% sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 13, 18 and 21, and there were neither false negatives nor false positives. For pregnant women < 35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.67), 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.67), and 0.89 (95% CI 0.54-1.45), respectively. For pregnant women ≥35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.26 (95% CI 0.06-1.03), 2.59 (95% CI 1.67-4.01), and 7.25 (95% CI 5.58-9.41), respectively. For all pregnancies, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.57), 0.97 (95% CI 0.66-1.44), 2.80 (95% CI 2.22-3.52), respectively.

Indexed as

Down SyndromeAneuploidyFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrevalenceTertiary Care CentersThailandTrisomyTrisomy 13 SyndromeTrisomy 18 Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37079630
PMCPMC10118185
OpenAlexW4366463597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.