ArticlePloS one2023
Indications of food insecurity in the content of telephone calls to a community referral system.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From calls to action: leveraging the 2-1-1 system to intervene on food insecurity.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Experiences of food insecurity in the Roma population before and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFood insecurity is a social determinant of health that impacts more than 10% of U.S. households every year. Many unexpected events make food-insecure people and those with unmet food needs seek information and help from both formal (e.g., community organizations) and informal (e.g., family/friends) resources. Food-related information seeking through telephone calls to a community referral system-211 network-has been used as a proxy for food insecurity but the context of these calls has not been characterized and the validity of this proxy measure is unknown.
objectiveTo investigate the content of food-related telephone calls to 211 and explore the indications of food insecurity during these calls.
methodsWe conducted a secondary qualitative analysis on the transcripts of food-related calls to Utah's 211. From February to March 2022, 25 calls were sampled based on the location of callers to ensure the representation of rural residents. 13 calls from metropolitan and 12 calls from nonmetropolitan ZIP Codes were included. Using a purposive sampling approach, we also made sure that the sample varied with regard to race and ethnicity. Calls were transcribed and de-identified by our community partner-Utah's 211 and were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach by our research team.
resultsThree themes emerged from the qualitative analysis including referral to 211, reasons for food-related calls, and reasons for unmet food needs. Results highlight the complex social environment around 211 food-related callers, lack of knowledge about available food resources, and indications of food insecurity in calls.
conclusionInformation seeking for food-related resources through 211 is a problem-solving source for people living in a complex social environment. Indications of food insecurity through these calls validate the use of these calls as a proxy measure for food insecurity. Interventions should be designed to increase awareness about the available resources and address the co-existing social needs with food insecurity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.