Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Optimal placebo-treatment comparisons in trials with an incomplete within-subject design and heterogeneous costs and variances.

Mirjam Moerbeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Placebo-resistant gut bacteria:Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mirjam MoerbeekDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5537-1237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of a clinical trial is to compare placebo to one or more treatments. The within-subject design is known to be more efficient than the between-subject design. However, in some trials that implement a within-subject design it is not possible to evaluate the placebo and all treatments within each subject. The design then becomes an incomplete within-subject design. An important question is how many subjects should be allocated to each combination of placebo and treatments. This paper studies optimal allocations of subjects in trials with a placebo and two treatments under heterogenous costs and variances. Two optimality criteria that consider the placebo-treatment contrasts simultaneously are considered, and the design is derived under a budgetary constraint. More subjects are allocated to those combinations with higher variances and lower costs. The optimal allocation is compared to the uniform allocation, which allocates equal number of subjects to each placebo and treatment combination, and to the complete within-subject design, where placebo and all treatments are available in each subject. The methodology is illustrated on the basis of an example on consultation time in primary care. A Shiny app is available to facilitate use of the methodology.

Identifiers

PMID37079588
PMCPMC10118159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.