ArticlePloS one2023
Diverse evolutionary rates and gene duplication patterns among families of functional olfactory receptor genes in humans.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution of Characteristic Aroma During Processing of Space-Induced Mutant Dahongpao Tea and the Preliminary Exploration of Its Olfactory Perception.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Addendum: Detection of colinear blocks and synteny and evolutionary analyses based on utilization of MCScanX.Nature protocols · 2026Article
- Revealing the mechanism of shaking/tumbling driving Wuyi rock tea Rougui to "fade green odor and reveal aroma" based on metabolomics and molecular docking technology.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A Multimodal Single-Cell Epigenomic and 3D Genome Atlas of the Human Basal Ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In humans, odors are detected by ~400 functional olfactory receptor (OR) genes. The superfamily of functional OR genes can be further divided into tens of families. In large part, the OR genes have experienced extensive tandem duplications, which have led to gene gains and losses. However, whether different OR gene families have experienced distinct modes of gene duplication has yet to be reported. We conducted comparative genomic and evolutionary analyses for human functional OR genes. Based on analysis of human-mouse 1-1 orthologs, we found that human functional OR genes show higher-than-average evolutionary rates, and there are significant differences among families of functional OR genes. Via comparison with seven vertebrate outgroups, families of human functional OR genes show different extents of gene synteny conservation. Although the superfamily of human functional OR genes is enriched in tandem and proximal duplications, there are particular families which are enriched in segmental duplications. These findings suggest that human functional OR genes may be governed by different evolutionary mechanisms and that large-scale gene duplications have contributed to the early evolution of human functional OR genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.