Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079361›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2023

Extended Family Outreach in Hereditary Cancer Using Web-Based Genealogy, Direct-to-Consumer Ancestry Genetics, and Social Media: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of the ConnectMyVariant Intervention.

Annie T Chen, Jennifer Huey, Sandra Coe, Jailanie Kaganovsky, Emily A Malouf, Heather D Evans, Jill Daker, Elizabeth Harper, Olivia Fordiani, Emma E Lowe and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annie T ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3070-8336
Jennifer HueyDepartment of Laborabory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1731-8416
Sandra CoeDepartment of Laborabory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6413-2672
Jailanie KaganovskyDepartment of Laborabory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3966-5673
Emily A MaloufDepartment of Laborabory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-8720
Heather D EvansCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4012-7724
Jill DakerCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7519-6920
Elizabeth HarperCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5971-0712
Olivia FordianiCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7209-6326
Emma E LoweCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8800-0263
Caileigh McGraw OldroydCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0295-1314
Ashlyn PriceCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4659-0082
Kristlynn RothCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5708-3251
Julie StoddardCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3293-1220
Jill N CrandellCenter for Family History and Genealogy, Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5631-8962
Brian H Shirts *Department of Laborabory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-6764
Brigham Young University · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCascade screening, defined as helping at-risk relatives get targeted genetic testing of familial variants for dominant hereditary cancer syndromes, is a proven component of cancer prevention; however, its uptake is low. We developed and conducted a pilot study of the ConnectMyVariant intervention, in which participants received support to contact at-risk relatives that extended beyond first-degree relatives and encourage relatives to obtain genetic testing and connect with others having the same variant through email and social media. The support that participants received included listening to participants' needs, assisting with documentary genealogy to find common ancestors, facilitating direct-to-consumer DNA testing and interpretation, and assisting with database searches.

objectiveWe aimed to assess intervention feasibility, motivations for participating, and engagement among ConnectMyVariant participants and their families.

methodsWe used a mixed methods design including both quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods. First, we considered intervention feasibility by characterizing recruitment and retention using multiple recruitment mechanisms, including web-based advertising, dissemination of invitations with positive test results, provider recruitment, snowball sampling, and recruitment through web-based social networks and research studies. Second, we characterized participants' motivations, concerns, and engagement through project documentation of participant engagement in outreach activities and qualitative analysis of participant communications. We used an inductive qualitative data analysis approach to analyze emails, free-text notes, and other communications generated with participants as part of the ConnectMyVariant intervention.

resultsWe identified 84 prospective participants using different recruitment mechanisms; 57 participants were ultimately enrolled in the study for varying lengths of time. With respect to motivations for engaging in the intervention, participants were most interested in activities relating to genealogy and communication with others who had their specific variants. Although there was a desire to find others with the same variant and prevent cancer, more participants expressed an interest in learning about their genealogy and family health history, with prevention in relatives considered a natural side effect of outreach. Concerns about participation included whether relatives would be open to communication, how to go about it, and whether others with a specific variant would be motivated to help find common ancestors. We observed that ConnectMyVariant participants engaged in 6 primary activities to identify and communicate with at-risk relatives: sharing family history, family member testing, direct-to-consumer genealogy genetic testing analysis, contacting (distant) relatives, documentary genealogy, and expanding variant groups or outreach. Participants who connected with others who had the same variant were more likely to engage with several extended family outreach activities.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that there is an interest in extended family outreach as a mechanism to improve cascade screening for hereditary cancer prevention. Additional research to systematically evaluate the outcomes of such outreach may be challenging but is warranted.

Indexed as

BRCA1BRCA2breast cancercascade screeningdistant relativesFacebookfamilial cancerfamily historyhereditary cancerPALB2partner and localizer of BRCA2patient advocacypedigree building

Identifiers

PMID37079361
PMCPMC10160942
OpenAlexW4322711400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.