Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079348›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2023

Suicide Prevention Using Google Ads: Randomized Controlled Trial Measuring Engagement.

Sandersan Onie, Patrick Berlinquette, Sarah Holland, Nicola Livingstone, Coco Finemore, Nyree Gale, Emma Elder, George Laggis, Cassandra Heffernan, Susanne Oliver Armstrong and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Are codesigned programmes more difficult to implement? A qualitative study of staff perceptions on the implementation of a new youth mental health programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. A qualitative evaluation of a co-design process involving young people at risk of suicide.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sandersan OnieBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-8102
Patrick BerlinquetteBERLIN SEM, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1242-8552
Sarah HollandBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-5699
Nicola LivingstoneBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7600-2745
Coco FinemoreBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-1866
Nyree GaleBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-3679
Emma ElderBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-0146
George LaggisBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-2541
Cassandra HeffernanBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-7970
Susanne Oliver ArmstrongBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0344-4398
Adam TheobaldBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-4992
Natasha JosifovskiBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9692-0682
Michelle TorokBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-8075
Fiona ShandBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-228X
Mark LarsenBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-2053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown that individuals may search for suicide-related terms on the internet prior to an attempt.

objectiveThus, across 2 studies, we investigated engagement with an advertisement campaign designed to reach individuals contemplating suicide.

methodsFirst, we designed the campaign to focus on crisis, running a campaign for 16 days in which crisis-related keywords would trigger an ad and landing page to help individuals find the national suicide hotline number. Second, we expanded the campaign to also help individuals contemplating suicide, running the campaign for 19 days with a wider range of keywords through a co-designed website with a wider range of offerings (eg, lived experience stories).

resultsIn the first study, the ad was shown 16,505 times and was clicked 664 times (4.02% click rate). There were 101 calls to the hotline. In the second study, the ad was shown 120,881 times and clicked 6227 times (5.15% click rate); of these 6227 clicks, there were 1419 (22.79%) engagements with the site, a substantially higher rate than the industry average of 3%. The number of clicks on the ad was high despite a suicide hotline banner likely being present.

conclusionsSearch advertisements are a quick, far-reaching, and cost-efficient way of reaching those contemplating suicide and are needed despite suicide hotline banners being present.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623000084684; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385209.

Indexed as

advertiseadvertisingcampaigndigital advertisingdigital interventionGoogle Adsmental healthonline interventionpreventionsearchself harmsuicidalsuicidesuicide hotlinesuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID37079348
PMCPMC10160926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.