Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079294›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2023

Quality of life, wellbeing, recovery, and progress for older forensic mental health patients: a qualitative investigation based on the perspectives of patients and staff.

Kate Walker, Jen Yates, Tom Dening, Birgit Völlm, Jack Tomlin, Chris Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate WalkerResearch and Innovation, Northampton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9796-2200
Jen YatesInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tom DeningInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Birgit VöllmKlinik und Poliklinik für Forensische Psychiatrie, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Jack TomlinSchool of Law and Criminology, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Chris GriffithsResearch and Innovation, Northampton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is a lack of research informing service requirements for older (aged≥55 years) forensic mental health patients. The aim of this research was to increase knowledge about older forensic mental health patients' quality of life, wellbeing, recovery, and progress, in order to make recommendations of how to facilitate and enhance these factors.

methodsIn-depth interviews with patients (

resultsEnvironmental (e.g., physical, structural and facilities), relational (staff, family and friends) and individual (characteristics, feelings, behaviours) factors were identified as enablers and/or obstacles to wellbeing, recovery, progress and quality of life.

conclusionsThe physical and psychological environment of services needs to be adapted to meet the needs of patients. Therapeutic relationships with staff should be encouraged and a person-centred and individual recovery approach adopted. Prosocial relationships with peers, friends and family need to be fostered to enable positive recovery outcomes. Older patients should be empowered to develop a sense of autonomy to enable quality of life, wellbeing, and recovery, and progress.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPersons with Psychiatric DisordersHumansPalliative CarePatientsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeForensic mental healtholder patientsquality of liferecoveryservice provision

Identifiers

PMID37079294
PMCPMC10120527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.