ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2023
Micropenis.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital aphallia: From embryology to management - a focused minireview.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Management of andrological disorders from childhood and adolescence to transition age: guidelines from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) in collaboration with the Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (SIEDP) - part-2.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Testosterone effect on anesthesia depth in micropenis hypospadias surgery: A prospective cohort study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- A Novel Variant inJCEM case reports · 2025Article
- Pediatric Endocrinology in Office Practice - The Way Forward.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Micropenis in Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micropenis, i.e., a structurally normal but abnormally small penis is defined as stretched penile length (SPL) 2.5 SD below the mean for age and sexual stage. Several studies worldwide have published country-specific normative data on SPL; an appropriate cutoff for evaluation of micropenis as per international standards would be below 2 cm at birth and below 4 cm after 5 y of age. Testosterone production by fetal testes, its conversion to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and its action on the androgen receptor is necessary for normal penile development. Hypothalamo-pituitary disorders (gonadotropin or growth hormone deficiencies), genetic syndromes, partial gonadal dysgenesis, testicular regression, disorders of testosterone biosynthesis and action constitute the various etiologies of micropenis. Associated hypospadias, incomplete scrotal fusion, and cryptorchidism are suggestive of disorders of sex development (DSD). Along with basal and human chorionic gonadotropins (HCG)-stimulated gonadotropins, testosterone, DHT, and androstenedione levels, karyotype assessment is equally important. Treatment aims at attaining penile length sufficient enough for urination and to perform sexual function. Hormonal therapy with intramuscular or topical testosterone, topical DHT or recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) should be attempted in the neonatal or infancy period. The role of surgery for micropenis is limited and has variable patient satisfaction and complication outcomes. There is a need for long-term studies on the adult SPL achieved following treatment for micropenis in infancy and childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.