Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079216›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2023

Chow diet in mouse aging studies: nothing regular about it.

Jennifer Lee, Chloe Purello, Sarah L Booth, Brian Bennett, Christopher D Wiley, Ron Korstanje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer LeeJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center On Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington St, Boston, MA, USA. jen.lee@tufts.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0071-1438
Chloe PurelloJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center On Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington St, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah L BoothJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center On Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington St, Boston, MA, USA.
Brian BennettAgricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA, USA.
Christopher D WileyJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center On Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington St, Boston, MA, USA.
Ron KorstanjeThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.

Funding

Translational CoreP30AG038070 · NIA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI John Matthew Mahoney · 2010 to 2026
$19.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG038070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chow diet is used in the majority of rodent studies and, although assumed to be standardized for dietary source and nutritional contents, it varies widely across commercial formulations. Similarly, current approaches to study aging in rodents involve a single-diet formulation across the lifespan and overlook age-specific nutritional requirements, which may have long-term effects on aging processes. Together, these nutrition-based disparities represent major gaps in geroscience research, affecting the interpretation and reproducibility of the studies. This perspective aims to raise awareness on the importance of rodent diet formulation and proposes that geroscientists include detailed descriptions of all experimental diets and feeding protocols. Detailed reporting of diets will enhance rigor and reproducibility of aging rodent studies and lead to more translational outcomes in geroscience research.

Indexed as

DietRodentiaAgingAnimalsLongevityMiceReproducibility of ResultsAgingChow dietDietary source

Identifiers

PMID37079216
PMCPMC10400503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.