Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079079›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Clinical outcomes and complications after biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 3673 cases.

Don Y Park, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Nora Curtin, Christopher D Hamad, Akash Shah, Brian Kwon, Yong H Kim, Dong Hwa Heo, Cheol Woong Park, William L Sheppard

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Learning curve insights in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spinal procedures: proficiency cutoffs and the impact on efficiency and complications.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A summer reflection.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Don Y ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 16th Street, Suite 3142, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA. dypark@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3575-2758
Alexander Upfill-BrownDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 16th Street, Suite 3142, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA.
Nora CurtinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 16th Street, Suite 3142, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA.
Christopher D HamadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 16th Street, Suite 3142, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA.
Akash ShahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 16th Street, Suite 3142, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA.
Brian KwonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Yong H KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Dong Hwa HeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Champodonamu Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Cheol Woong ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Woori Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
William L SheppardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 16th Street, Suite 3142, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent literature suggests that biportal spinal endoscopy is safe and effective in treating lumbar spine pathology such as lumbar disc herniation, lumbar stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. No prior study has investigated the postoperative outcomes or complication profile of the technique as a whole. This study serves as the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of biportal spinal endoscopy in the lumbar spine.

methodsA PubMed literature search provided over 100 studies. 42 papers were reviewed and 3673 cases were identified with average follow-up time of 12.5 months. Preoperative diagnoses consisted of acute disc herniation (1098), lumbar stenosis (2432), and degenerative spondylolisthesis (229). Demographics, operative details, complications, and perioperative outcome and satisfaction scores were analyzed.

resultsAverage age was 61.32 years, 48% male. 2402 decompressions, 1056 discectomies, and 261 transforaminal lumbar Interbody fusions (TLIFs) were performed. Surgery was performed on 4376 lumbar levels, with L4-5 being most common(61.3%). 290 total complications occurred, 2.23% durotomies, 1.29% inadequate decompressions, 3.79% epidural hematomas, and < 1% transient nerve root injuries, infections, and iatrogenic instability. Significant improvement in VAS-Back, VAS-Leg, ODI, and Macnab Scores were seen across the cohort.

conclusionBiportal spinal endoscopy is a novel method to address pathology in the lumbar spine with direct visualization through an endoscopic approach. Complications are comparable to previously published rates. Clinical outcomes demonstrate effectiveness. Prospective studies are required to assess the efficacy of the technique as compared to traditional techniques. This study demonstrates that the technique can be successful in the lumbar spine.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementSpinal FusionSpinal StenosisSpondylolisthesisConstriction, PathologicEndoscopyFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiportal endoscopic spine surgeryEndoscopic spine surgeryMinimally invasive spine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.