Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079051›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Gender-specific outcomes in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laila Schneidewind, Bernhard Kiss, Friedemann Zengerling, Angelika Borkowetz, Sebastian Graf, Jennifer Kranz, Desiree L Dräger, Annabel Graser, Laura Bellut, Annemarie Uhlig

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Laila Schneidewind *Department of Urology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany. laila.schneidewind@med.uni-rostock.de.
Bernhard Kiss *Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Friedemann ZengerlingDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Angelika BorkowetzDepartment of Urology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian GrafDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria.
Jennifer KranzDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Desiree L DrägerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Annabel GraserDepartment of Urology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Laura BellutDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Annemarie UhligDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
University of Rostock · DEKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DETU Dresden · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze gender-specific differences in survival parameters in advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibition.

methodsThe primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate gender-specific differences in disease-free (DFS), progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). The sources MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from January 2010 to June 2022. No restrictions were made concerning language, study region or publication type. A comparison of gender-specific differences in survival parameters was performed using a random-effects meta-analysis. A risk of bias assessment was done using the ROBINS-I tool.

resultsFive studies were included. In a random-effect meta-analysis of the studies, PCD4989g and IMvigor 211 with both using atezolizumab, females were more likely to have better objective response rate (ORR) than men (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.20-4.16; p = 0.0110). In addition, females had a comparable median OS to men (MD 1.16; 95% CI - 3.15-5.46; p = 0.598). In summary, comparing all results, a tendency was seen toward better response rates and survival parameters in female patients. The risk of bias assessment yielded an overall low risk of bias.

conclusionsThere is a tendency toward better outcomes in women for immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, but only for the antibody atezolizumab women have a significantly better ORR. Unfortunately, many studies fail to report gender-specific outcomes. Therefore, further research is essential when aiming for individualized medicine. This research should address immunological confounders.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleProgression-Free SurvivalRadioimmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBladder cancerGenderImmunotherapyOverall survivalUrothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID37079051
PMCPMC10374671
OpenAlexW4366462815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.