Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37078586›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2023

An arginase 2 promoter transgenic line illuminates immune cell polarisation in zebrafish.

Ffion R Hammond, Amy Lewis, Zoë C Speirs, Holly E Anderson, Tamara Sipka, Lewis G Williams, Mai Nguyen-Chi, Annemarie H Meijer, Geert F Wiegertjes, Philip M Elks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ZebrafishLife science alliance · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ffion R HammondThe Bateson Centre, Department of Infection and Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Amy LewisThe Bateson Centre, Department of Infection and Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Zoë C SpeirsThe Bateson Centre, Department of Infection and Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Holly E AndersonThe Bateson Centre, Department of Infection and Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Tamara SipkaLPHI, University of Montpellier, CNRS, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Lewis G WilliamsThe Bateson Centre, Department of Infection and Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Mai Nguyen-ChiLPHI, University of Montpellier, CNRS, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Annemarie H MeijerInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-0725
Geert F WiegertjesAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Philip M ElksThe Bateson Centre, Department of Infection and Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1683-0749
University of Sheffield · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLeiden University · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate immune responses to inflammation and infection are complex and represent major challenges for developing much needed new treatments for chronic inflammatory diseases and drug-resistant infections. To be ultimately successful, the immune response must be balanced to allow pathogen clearance without excess tissue damage, processes controlled by pro- and anti-inflammatory signals. The roles of anti-inflammatory signalling in raising an appropriate immune response are underappreciated, representing overlooked potential drug targets. This is especially true in neutrophils, a difficult cell type to study ex vivo owing to a short lifespan, dogmatically seen as being highly pro-inflammatory. Here, we have generated and describe the first zebrafish transgenic line [TgBAC(arg2:eGFP)sh571] that labels expression of the anti-inflammatory gene arginase 2 (arg2) and show that a subpopulation of neutrophils upregulate arginase soon after immune challenge with injury and infection. At wound-healing stages, arg2:GFP is expressed in subsets of neutrophils and macrophages, potentially representing anti-inflammatory, polarised immune cell populations. Our findings identify nuanced responses to immune challenge in vivo, responses that represent new opportunities for therapeutic interventions during inflammation and infection.

Indexed as

ArginaseZebrafishAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsInflammationNeutrophilsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsArginaseAnti-inflammatoryInfectionInflammationMacrophageNeutrophilZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID37078586
PMCPMC10163355
OpenAlexW4366462790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.