ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy
Recent advances in stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.
Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- miR-145-enriched BMSCs-derived exosomes ameliorate neurogenic erectile dysfunction in aged rats via TGFBR2 inhibition.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Infertility treatment using polysaccharides-based hydrogels: new strategies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- The New Approach to Treating Erectile Dysfunction: Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Experimental Models in Penile Transplantation: Translational Insights and Relevance to Clinical Application.Cureus · 2024Review
- Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
- Recovery of the hibernating cavernosum by penile revascularization.Arab journal of urology · 2024Article
- Treatment of erectile dysfunction by intracavernosal administration of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with diabetes mellitus.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) and others are used to treat Erectile dysfunction (ED), many patients are either unresponsive or resistant to it. Stem cell therapy (SCT) is a promising alternative approach. Numerous preclinical trials have demonstrated improved erectile function in animal models using SCT, although the number of clinical trials investigating SCT for men with ED is limited. Nonetheless, findings from human clinical trials suggest that SCT may be a useful treatment option. AREAS COVERED: Biomedical literature, including PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and European Union Clinical Trials Registry, were analyzed to summarize and synthesize information on stem cell therapy for ED in this narrative review. The achievements in preclinical and clinical evaluations are presented and critically analyzed. EXPERT OPINION: SCT has demonstrated some benefits in improving erectile function, while further studies are urgently needed. Such studies would provide valuable insights into the optimal use of stem cell therapy and its potential as a therapeutic option for ED. Taking advantage of different mechanisms of action involved in various regenerative therapies, combination therapies such as SCT and low-energy shock waves or platelet-rich plasma may provide a more effective therapy and warrant further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.