Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077985›Full record

ReviewQuantitative plant biology2022

Embodiment in distributed information processing: "Solid" plants versus "liquid" ant colonies.

Laura van Schijndel, Basten L Snoek, Kirsten Ten Tusscher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Plants sum and subtract stimuli over different timescales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura van SchijndelLaboratory of Genetics, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-9997
Basten L SnoekBioinformatics Group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kirsten Ten TusscherComputational Developmental Biology Group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1945-7858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information processing is an essential part of biology, enabling coordination of intra-organismal processes such as development, environmental adaptation and inter-organismal communication. Whilst in animals with specialised brain tissue a substantial amount of information processing occurs in a centralised manner, most biological computing is distributed across multiple entities, such as cells in a tissue, roots in a root system or ants in a colony. Physical context, called embodiment, also affects the nature of biological computing. While plants and ant colonies both perform distributed computing, in plants the units occupy fixed positions while individual ants move around. This distinction, solid versus liquid brain computing, shapes the nature of computations. Here we compare information processing in plants and ant colonies, highlighting how similarities and differences originate in, as well as make use of, the differences in embodiment. We end with a discussion on how this embodiment perspective may inform the debate on plant cognition.

Indexed as

distributed computingembodimentinformation processesliquid brainssolid brains

Identifiers

PMID37077985
PMCPMC10095861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.