Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077982›Full record

ReviewQuantitative plant biology2022

Plant genome sequence assembly in the era of long reads: Progress, challenges and future directions.

Boas Pucker, Iker Irisarri, Jan de Vries, Bo Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nanopore Data-Driven Near-T2T Genome Assembly ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Powering Up Plant Genetic Research with Genomic Data 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boas PuckerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-7471
Iker IrisarriDepartment of Applied Bioinformatics, Institute for Microbiology and Genetics, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-1137
Jan de VriesDepartment of Applied Bioinformatics, Institute for Microbiology and Genetics, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-5195
Bo XuState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-7127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Third-generation long-read sequencing is transforming plant genomics. Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Pacific Biosciences are offering competing long-read sequencing technologies and enable plant scientists to investigate even large and complex plant genomes. Sequencing projects can be conducted by single research groups and sequences of smaller plant genomes can be completed within days. This also resulted in an increased investigation of genomes from multiple species in large scale to address fundamental questions associated with the origin and evolution of land plants. Increased accessibility of sequencing devices and user-friendly software allows more researchers to get involved in genomics. Current challenges are accurately resolving diploid or polyploid genome sequences and better accounting for the intra-specific diversity by switching from the use of single reference genome sequences to a pangenome graph.

Indexed as

haplophasinglong read sequencingOxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)Pacific Biociences (PacBio)plant genome assemblyplant genomics

Identifiers

PMID37077982
PMCPMC10095996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.