Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077927›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2023

A 6-month, Multi-center, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Biofilm Disrupting Acne Cream on Mild-to-Moderate Facial Acne in Female Volunteer Subjects.

Allyson Marshall-Hudson, Michael Tuley, Maureen Damstra, Jonathan S Dosik, Matthew F Myntti, Dianne Porral, Janel Palomo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03106766 (A Single-center, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Next Science™ Acne Cream on Mild to Moderate Facial Acne in Adult Females Over 6 Months.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03106766 early_phase1terminatednot on this map

A Single-center, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Next Science™ Acne Cream on Mild to Moderate Facial Acne in Adult Females Over 6 Months.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNext Science TMRan2017 to 2017Enrolled2ConditionsAcne VulgarisArmsAcne cream 2X, Acne cream 1X
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selective Modulation ofClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allyson Marshall-HudsonDrs. Marshall-Hudson, Tuley, and Dosik and Ms. Damstra are with TKL Research, Inc. in Fair Lawn, New Jersey.
Michael TuleyDrs. Marshall-Hudson, Tuley, and Dosik and Ms. Damstra are with TKL Research, Inc. in Fair Lawn, New Jersey.
Maureen DamstraDrs. Marshall-Hudson, Tuley, and Dosik and Ms. Damstra are with TKL Research, Inc. in Fair Lawn, New Jersey.
Jonathan S DosikDrs. Marshall-Hudson, Tuley, and Dosik and Ms. Damstra are with TKL Research, Inc. in Fair Lawn, New Jersey.
Matthew F MynttiDr. Myntti and Ms. Porral and Ms. Palomo are with Next Science, LLC in Jacksonville, Florida.
Dianne PorralDr. Myntti and Ms. Porral and Ms. Palomo are with Next Science, LLC in Jacksonville, Florida.
Janel PalomoDr. Myntti and Ms. Porral and Ms. Palomo are with Next Science, LLC in Jacksonville, Florida.
TKL Research · USNemours Children's Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to assess the change in acne lesions and severity within all treatment groups over the course of a six-month study. Methods: This was a six-month, multisite, randomized, double-blind, controlled study in female subjects with mild-to-moderate acne to assess the clinical and psychological outcomes of treatment with biofilm disrupting acne cream 2x, biofilm disrupting acne cream 1x, biofilm disrupting acne cream without salicylic acid, 2.5% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) gel, and placebo. Subjects applied the assigned product to their face twice daily and were evaluated for clinical acne and quality of life outcomes at baseline and after six, 12, 18, and 24 weeks of treatment. Results: After 24 weeks of use, subjects treated with biofilm disrupting acne cream 2x had a significantly greater improvement in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), compared to those treated with 2.5% BPO gel. Based on dermatologic assessments, biofilm disrupting acne cream 2x, biofilm disrupting acne cream 1x, biofilm disrupting acne cream without salicylic acid, and placebo control were associated with less erythema and dryness, compared to 2.5% BPO gel. Limitations: Assessments within this study had the potential for subjective differences due to variability between evaluators. Conclucion: Biofilm disrupting acne cream 2x and biofilm disrupting acne cream 1x provided equivalent efficacy to 2.5% BPO gel with less of the adverse effects commonly associated with BPO, such as erythema and dryness. Both the biofilm disrupting acne cream without salicylic acid and the placebo control were associated with mild improvements to acne symptoms over the course of the 24-week study. Trial Registry Information: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03106766.

Indexed as

Acne vulgarisbiofilmCutibacterium acnesInvestigator’s Global Assessmentlesionsquality of lifesebaceous gland diseaseskin disease

Identifiers

PMID37077927
PMCPMC10110293
OpenAlexW4366602802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.