Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077739›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Clinical efficacy and safety of Cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve calcification.

Ruikang Guo, Chengming Fan, Zhishan Sun, Hao Zhang, Yaqin Sun, Long Song, Zenan Jiang, Liming Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruikang GuoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chengming FanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhishan SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yaqin SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Long SongDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zenan JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liming LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CNSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Atrial fibrillation is associated with a high incidence of heart valve disease. There are few prospective clinical research comparing aortic valve replacement with and without surgical ablation for safety and effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of aortic valve replacement with and without the Cox-maze IV procedure in patients with calcific aortic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation. Methods: We analyzed one hundred and eight patients with calcific aortic valve disease and atrial fibrillation who underwent aortic valve replacement. Patients were divided into concomitant Cox maze surgery (Cox-maze group) and no concomitant Cox-maze operation (no Cox-maze group). After surgery, freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence and all-cause mortality were evaluated. Results: Freedom from all-cause mortality after aortic valve replacement at 1 year was 100% in the Cox-maze group and 89%, respectively, in the no Cox-maze group. No Cox-maze group had a lower rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence and arrhythmia control than those in the Cox-maze group ( Conclusion: The Cox-maze IV surgery combined with aortic valve replacement increased mid-term survival and decreased mid-term atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with calcific aortic valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Pre-operatively higher systolic blood pressure and post-operatively increased right atrium diameters are associated with the prediction of recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

aortic stenosisatrial fibrillationcalcific aortic valve diseaseefficacysafetysurgical ablation

Identifiers

PMID37077739
PMCPMC10106572
OpenAlexW4362591071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.