Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077629›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Crop pest image classification based on improved densely connected convolutional network.

Hongxing Peng, Huiming Xu, Zongmei Gao, Zhiyan Zhou, Xingguo Tian, Qianting Deng, Huijun He, Chunlong Xian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongxing PengCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Huiming XuCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zongmei GaoCenter for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, United States.
Zhiyan ZhouCollege of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xingguo TianCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Qianting DengDepartment of Asset and Laboratory Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Huijun HeCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunlong XianCollege of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Crop pests have a great impact on the quality and yield of crops. The use of deep learning for the identification of crop pests is important for crop precise management. Methods: To address the lack of data set and poor classification accuracy in current pest research, a large-scale pest data set named HQIP102 is built and the pest identification model named MADN is proposed. There are some problems with the IP102 large crop pest dataset, such as some pest categories are wrong and pest subjects are missing from the images. In this study, the IP102 data set was carefully filtered to obtain the HQIP102 data set, which contains 47,393 images of 102 pest classes on eight crops. The MADN model improves the representation capability of DenseNet in three aspects. Firstly, the Selective Kernel unit is introduced into the DenseNet model, which can adaptively adjust the size of the receptive field according to the input and capture target objects of different sizes more effectively. Secondly, in order to make the features obey a stable distribution, the Representative Batch Normalization module is used in the DenseNet model. In addition, adaptive selection of whether to activate neurons can improve the performance of the network, for which the ACON activation function is used in the DenseNet model. Finally, the MADN model is constituted by ensemble learning. Results: Experimental results show that MADN achieved an accuracy and F1Score of 75.28% and 65.46% on the HQIP102 data set, an improvement of 5.17 percentage points and 5.20 percentage points compared to the pre-improvement DenseNet-121. Compared with ResNet-101, the accuracy and F1Score of MADN model improved by 10.48 percentage points and 10.56 percentage points, while the parameters size decreased by 35.37%. Deploying models to cloud servers with mobile application provides help in securing crop yield and quality.

Indexed as

DenseNet-121ensemble learningpest image classificationrepresentative batch normalizationselective kernel unit

Identifiers

PMID37077629
PMCPMC10106646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.