Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077615›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Pooled Prevalence of Long COVID-19 Symptoms at 12 Months and Above Follow-Up Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shiv K Mudgal, Rakhi Gaur, Satyaveer Rulaniya, Latha T, Rajat Agarwal, Subodh Kumar, Saurabh Varshney, Suresh Sharma, Sudip Bhattacharya, Vasantha Kalyani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prevalence and symptoms of Long Covid-19 in the workplace.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shiv K MudgalCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Rakhi GaurCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Satyaveer RulaniyaCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Latha TCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Kalyani, West Bengal, IND.
Rajat AgarwalDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Subodh KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Saurabh VarshneyDepartment of Otolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Suresh SharmaCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Sudip BhattacharyaDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Vasantha KalyaniCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current data suggests that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors experience long-lasting problems. It is not yet understood how long these symptoms last. The goal of this study was to compile all the data that was currently available to evaluate COVID-19's long-term effects at 12 months and above. We looked for studies published by December 15, 2022, in PubMed and Embase that discussed follow-up findings for COVID-19 survivors who had been alive for at least a year. A random-effect model was carried out to determine the combined prevalence of different long-COVID symptoms. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used to assess the risk of bias for the included studies, and the I2 statistics were used to evaluate the heterogeneity. After reviewing 3,209 studies, 46 were deemed admissible, with an aggregate COVID-19 population of 17976. At 12 months and above, 57% of patients reported a minimum of one symptom, and the five most prevalent symptoms were: dyspnea on exertion (34%, 95% CI 0.2; 0.94); difficulty in concentration (32%, 95% CI 0.16; 0.52); fatigue (31%, 95% CI 0.22; 0.40); frailty (31%, 95% CI 0.06; 0.78); and arthromyalgia (28%, 95% CI 0.09; 0.6). The findings of the present study showed that at 12 months and beyond, a sizable fraction of COVID-19 survivors still have lasting symptoms that impair several body systems. Long-COVID patients require an urgent understanding of pathophysiological processes and the development of tailored treatments.

Indexed as

a systematic reviewlong term covid-19meta-analysisprevalencesymptoms

Identifiers

PMID37077615
PMCPMC10108372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.