ArticleCureus2023
A Prospective Study Comparing Stapler and Open Surgical Technique of Hemorrhoidectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Hemorrhoids are basically anal cushions which turn out to be pathological giving rise to bleeding, pain and protrusion outside the anal canal. The chief complaint of patients with hemorrhoids is bleeding from the rectum which is usually painless and associated with episodes of defecation. The study was done to assess postoperative pain, time duration of the procedure, complications in the postoperative period, return to normal work, and recurrence between the stapler and open hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Material and methods The present prospective study was conducted among 60 patients in the General Surgery department at Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Patna, Bihar over the duration of two years presenting with grade III and IV degree hemorrhoids. Thirty patients each were divided into open hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy groups. The study evaluated variables like operative time, stay at the hospital and postoperative complications and compared them between the two techniques. Follow-up of patients was done at regular intervals. Evaluation of postoperative pain was done using visual analogue scale (VAS) with ranges from 0 to 10. We evaluated the data using the chi-square test with a p-value <0.05 as significant. Results Of 60 patients, 47 (78.3%) were males and 13 (21.7%) were females with a male: female ratio being 3.6:1. The operating time and hospital stay were much less in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group as compared to the open procedure group. Also, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale) was less in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group with 36.7% of patients presenting with pain at one week, 23.3% at one month and 3.3% at three months in the open hemorrhoidectomy group whereas 13.3% presenting as pain in one week, 10% presenting at one month and none presenting at three months in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group. There was recurrence seen in 10% of cases at three months in the open hemorrhoidectomy group as compared to the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group where no recurrence was found at three months follow-up. Conclusion Hemorrhoid offers a variety of surgical modalities of treatment. We have come to the conclusion that stapled hemorrhoidectomy has less complications and good patient compliance. It can be an effective option in the treatment of third and fourth-grade hemorrhoids. With proper training and expertise, stapler hemorrhoidectomy is a better and reliable technique for hemorrhoid surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.