ArticleCureus2023
Bridge Plating Versus Hybrid External Fixation in the Management of Proximal Tibia Metaphyseal Fractures.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Treatment options and research progress of proximal tibial extra-articular fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the surge in high-speed road traffic accidents during the past few years, extra-articular proximal tibia fractures have also risen in number. For the treatment of such fractures, various options are available like conservative treatment with casting, surgical treatment with plate osteosynthesis, or a hybrid external fixator. Exposure of the bone surface and extensive soft tissue dissection is needed in bridge plating, posing a risk of bleeding, infection, and soft-tissue healing issues, and the blood supply of the fractured area is also hampered as the periosteum is also destroyed. To avoid these complications, a hybrid external fixator can be used but it has its own risks of malunion, non-union, and pin-tract infections; another drawback is patient compliance. In this study, we compare the clinical and functional outcomes of two treatment modalities, i.e., bridge plating and hybrid external fixator, in the treatment of proximal tibia metaphyseal fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective randomized study was conducted from February 2021 to June 2022 on 46 adult patients diagnosed with proximal tibia metaphyseal fracture and willing to participate. An odd number of patients were treated with a bridge plate and even with a hybrid external fixator.
resultsA total of 46 patients were included in the study, sustaining proximal tibia metaphyseal fracture, out of which 23 patients underwent hybrid external fixation with an outcome of 69.43 ± 8.11 according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) and 23 for bridge plating which showed better results as their score at final follow-up was 75.00 ± 8.22.
conclusionAccording to our study, we found that bridge plating is a better treatment modality than the hybrid external fixator as the former showed better postoperative knee range of motion and functional outcome and led to a smaller number of complications. But the clinical outcome would also be influenced by the type of fracture, degree of comminution, type of injury, i.e., open or closed, and quality of bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.