ArticleCureus2023
Antibiotic Practice in Patients With Acute Abdomen Admitted to a Danish Regional Hospital: A Clinical Qualitative Assurance Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effect of blood purification combined with antibiotics on CC-16 and SP-D levels and prognosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Acute abdomen is often complicated by intra-abdominal infection requiring antibiotic therapy. Danish regional antibiotic guidelines emphasize the restricted use of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as cephalosporins. In this study, we aimed to evaluate antibiotic practices in relation to hospitalized patients with acute abdomen. Methodology This retrospective quality assurance study was conducted among patients admitted to the surgical emergency department at the North Denmark Regional Hospital during a four-month observation period. Data were extracted from electronic patient journals and entered in the Research Electronic Data Capture data management system for further analytical work. Results Of 331 patients, 174 (53%) were treated with antibiotics, of whom 98 (56%) had been treated with cephalosporin, 47 (27%) with benzylpenicillin and gentamicin, 22 (13%) with piperacillin/tazobactam, and seven (4%) with ciprofloxacin. Use of a cephalosporin-based antibiotic regimen was significantly more common in patients with acute appendicitis (75%) compared to other diagnostic groups, such as acute cholecystitis (57%), incarcerated hernia with strangulation (56%), acute pancreatitis (50%), and acute diverticulitis (30%). However, patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis (53%) were significantly more often treated with benzylpenicillin and gentamicin, whereas patients with complicated diverticulitis Hinchey stage 3-4 were significantly more often treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. In addition, as the severity of acute cholecystitis increased, it was more frequently treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. Conclusions The study revealed that cephalosporins are frequently used in patients hospitalized with acute abdomen. This finding conflicts with current regional antibiotic guidelines. Reinforcement of the guidelines is required as an essential measure against the development of antibiotic resistance associated with the use of cephalosporins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.