ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
User-centered development process of an operating interface to couple a robotic glove with a virtual environment to optimize hand rehabilitation following a stroke.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Sensor-Based Upper-Limb and Hand Exoskeletons for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Technical and Biomedical Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Poststroke Neurorehabilitation Using a Soft Robotic Glove Combined With a Virtual Environment: Preliminary Study on Feasibility, Safety, Effects, and User Satisfaction.JMIR neurotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Task-specific neurorehabilitation is crucial to optimize hand recovery shortly after a stroke, but intensive neurorehabilitation remains limited in resource-constrained healthcare systems. This has led to a growing interest in the use of robotic gloves as an adjunct intervention to intensify hand-specific neurorehabilitation. This study aims to develop and assess the usability of an operating interface supporting such a technology coupled with a virtual environment through a user-centered design approach. Methods: Fourteen participants with hand hemiparesis following a stroke were invited to don the robotic glove before browsing through the operating interface and its functionalities, and perform two mobility exercises in a virtual environment. Feedback was collected for improving technology usability. Participants completed the System Usability Scale and ABILHAND questionnaires and their recommendations were gathered and prioritized in a Pugh Matrix. Results: The System Usability Scale (SUS) score for the operating interface was excellent (M = 87.0 SD = 11.6). A total of 74 recommendations to improve the user interface, calibration process, and exercise usability were identified. Conclusion: The application of a full cycle of user-centred design approach confirms the high level of usability of the system which is perceived by end users as acceptable and useful for intensifying neurorehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.