Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077114›Full record

ReviewMedical gas research

Clinical effectiveness of medical ozone therapy in COVID-19: the evidence and gaps map.

Maria Emilia Gadelha Serra, José Baeza-Noci, Carmen Verônica Mendes Abdala, Marilia Moura Luvisotto, Charise Dallazem Bertol, Ana Paula Anzolin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical gas research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Emilia Gadelha SerraBrazilian Society of Medical Ozone Therapy (SOBOM), São Paulo, Brazil.
José Baeza-NociWorld Federation of Ozone Therapy (WFOT), Brescia, Italy.
Carmen Verônica Mendes AbdalaLatin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences (bIREME/OPAS/OMS), São Paulo, Brazil.
Marilia Moura LuvisottoBrazilian Society of Medical Ozone Therapy (SOBOM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Charise Dallazem BertolBrazilian Society of Medical Ozone Therapy (SOBOM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Paula AnzolinBrazilian Society of Medical Ozone Therapy (SOBOM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde · BRWorld Federation for Mental Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ozone therapy (OT), a medical procedure, has been showing good results during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). We aimed to build an evidence and gaps map (EGM) of OT in the COVID-19 ranking the articles found according to levels of evidence and outcomes. The EGM brings bubbles of different sizes and different colors according to the articles. The OT intervention used was major or minor autohemotherapy, rectal insufflation and ozonized saline solution. EGM was based on 13 clinical studies using OT for COVID-19 involving a total of 271 patients. We found 30 outcomes related to OT in COVID-19. Our EGM divided the outcomes into six groups: 1-clinical improvement; 2-hospitalization; 3-inflammatory, thromboembolic, infectious, or metabolic markers; 4-radiological aspects, 5-viral infection and 6-adverse events. Major autohemotherapy was present in 19 outcomes, followed by rectal insufflation. Improvement in clinical symptoms of COVID-19, improvement of respiratory function, improvement of oxygen saturation, reduction in hospital internment, decrease in C-reactive protein, decrease in ferritin, decrease in lactate dehydrogenase, decrease in interleukin 6, decrease in D-dimer, radiological improvement of lung lesions and absence of reported adverse events were related in the papers. The most commonly used concentrations of OT in major autohemotherapy and in rectal insufflation were 40 μg/mL and 35 μg/mL, respectively. Here, we bring the first EGM showing the efficacy and safety of OT in the treatment of COVID-19. OT can be used as integrative medical therapy in COVID-19 at a low cost and improve the health conditions of the patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19OzoneHospitalizationHumansSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeOzonecomplementary therapiescoronavirusCOVID-19evidence and gaps mapevidence mapmedical ozone therapymedicinal ozoneozoneozone therapySARS-COV-2

Identifiers

PMID37077114
PMCPMC10226688
OpenAlexW4366602216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.