Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37076861›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2023

Can carotid artery Doppler variations induced by the end-expiratory occlusion maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients?

Sonia D'Arrigo, Antonio Maria Dell'Anna, Claudio Sandroni, Antonio Messina, Sofia Cacciola, Chiara Pacini, Massimo Antonelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04470856 (Can Carotid Artery Doppler Variations Induced by End-expiratory Occlusion Manoeuvre Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Patients?), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04470856 nacompletednot on this map

Can Carotid Artery Doppler Variations Induced by End-expiratory Occlusion Manoeuvre Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Patients?

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2019 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsEnd-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sonia D'ArrigoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Antonio Maria Dell'AnnaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Claudio SandroniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. claudio.sandroni@policlinicogemelli.it.
Antonio MessinaHumanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Sofia CacciolaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Chiara PaciniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increase in cardiac index (CI) during an end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOt) predicts fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. However, if CI monitoring is unavailable or the echocardiographic window is difficult, using the carotid Doppler (CD) could be a feasible alternative to track CI changes. This study investigates whether changes in CD peak velocity (CDPV) and corrected flow time (cFT) during an EEOt were correlated with CI changes and if CDPV and cFT changes predicted fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.

methodsProspective, single-center study in adults with hemodynamic instability. The CDPV and cFT on carotid artery Doppler and hemodynamic variables from the pulse contour analysis EV1000™ were recorded at baseline, during a 20-s EEOt, and after fluid challenge (500 mL). We defined responders as those who increased CI ≥ 15% after a fluid challenge.

resultsWe performed 44 measurements in 18 mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock and without arrhythmias. The fluid responsiveness rate was 43.2%. The changes in CDPV were significantly correlated with changes in CI during EEOt (r = 0.51 [0.26-0.71]). A significant, albeit lower correlation, was found for cFT (r = 0.35 [0.1-0.58]). An increase in CI ≥ 5.35% during EEOt predicted fluid responsiveness with 78.9% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity, with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.85. An increase in CDPV ≥ 10.5% during an EEOt predicted fluid responsiveness with 96.2% specificity and 53.0% sensitivity with an AUROC of 0.74. Sixty-one percent of CDPV measurements (from - 13.5 to 9.5 cm/s) fell within the gray zone. The cFT changes during EEOt did not accurately predict fluid responsiveness.

conclusionsIn septic shock patients without arrhythmias, an increase in CDPV greater than 10.5% during a 20-s EEOt predicted fluid responsiveness with > 95% specificity. Carotid Doppler combined with EEOt may help optimize preload when invasive hemodynamic monitoring is unavailable. However, the 61% gray zone is a major limitation (retrospectively registered on Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04470856 on July 14, 2020).

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialShock, SepticAdultCarotid ArteriesFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansProspective StudiesStroke VolumeCarotid artery DopplerEnd-expiratory occlusion test (EEOt)Fluid challengeFluid responsivenessHeart–lung interaction

Identifiers

PMID37076861
PMCPMC10116770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.