Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37076851›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Implementation analysis of a case management intervention for people with complex care needs in primary care: a multiple case study across Canada.

Catherine Hudon, Mathieu Bisson, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Alannah Delahunty-Pike, Mireille Lambert, Dana Howse, Charlotte Schwarz, Olivier Dumont-Samson, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Fred Burge and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Catherine HudonDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Pavillon Z7-Room 3007, 3001, 12E Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada. catherine.hudon@usherbrooke.ca.
Mathieu BissonDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Pavillon Z7-Room 3007, 3001, 12E Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Maud-Christine ChouinardFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alannah Delahunty-PikeSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Mireille LambertDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Pavillon Z7-Room 3007, 3001, 12E Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Dana HowsePrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St-John's, NL, Canada.
Charlotte SchwarzDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Olivier Dumont-SamsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Pavillon Z7-Room 3007, 3001, 12E Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Kris Aubrey-BasslerPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St-John's, NL, Canada.
Fred BurgeSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Shelley DoucetDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Vivian R RamsdenDepartment of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Alison LukeDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Marilyn MacdonaldSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
André GaudreauDiabetes Action Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Judy PorterNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Donna RubensteinPatient Advisors Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cathy ScottCanadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mike WarrenPatient Advisory Council, Newfoundland and Labrador SPOR SUPPORT Unit, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Linda WilhelmCanadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 397896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCase management is one of the most frequently performed interventions to mitigate the negative effects of high healthcare use on patients, primary care providers and the healthcare system. Reviews have addressed factors influencing case management interventions (CMI) implementation and reported common themes related to the case manager role and activities, collaboration with other primary care providers, CMI training and relationships with the patients. However, the heterogeneity of the settings in which CMI have been implemented may impair the transferability of the findings. Moreover, the underlying factors influencing the first steps of CMI implementation need to be further assessed. This study aimed to evaluate facilitators and barriers of the first implementation steps of a CMI by primary care nurses for people with complex care needs who frequently use healthcare services.

methodsA qualitative multiple case study was conducted including six primary care clinics across four provinces in Canada. In-depth interviews and focus groups with nurse case managers, health services managers, and other primary care providers were conducted. Field notes also formed part of the data. A mixed thematic analysis, deductive and inductive, was carried out.

resultsLeadership of the primary care providers and managers facilitated the first steps of the of CMI implementation, as did the experience and skills of the nurse case managers and capacity development within the teams. The time required to establish CMI was a barrier at the beginning of the CMI implementation. Most nurse case managers expressed apprehension about developing an "individualized services plan" with multiple health professionals and the patient. Clinic team meetings and a nurse case managers community of practice created opportunities to address primary care providers' concerns. Participants generally perceived the CMI as a comprehensive, adaptable, and organized approach to care, providing more resources and support for patients and better coordination in primary care.

conclusionResults of this study will be useful for decision makers, care providers, patients and researchers who are considering the implementation of CMI in primary care. Providing knowledge about first steps of CMI implementation will also help inform policies and best practices.

Indexed as

Case ManagementDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchCase managementChronic conditionsComplex care needsFrequent usersImplementationMultiple case studyPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37076851
PMCPMC10116737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.