Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37076803›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2023

Predicting cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: using artificial intelligence, clinical and laboratory data.

Chang Hu, Ravishankar K Iyer, Brian D Juran, Bryan M McCauley, Elizabeth J Atkinson, John E Eaton, Ahmad H Ali, Konstantinos N Lazaridis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Mutational Analysis of Bile Cell-Free DNA in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Pilot Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and the path to translation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chang HuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.
Ravishankar K IyerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.
Brian D JuranDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Bryan M McCauleyDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Elizabeth J AtkinsonDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
John E EatonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ahmad H AliDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8553-7744
Konstantinos N LazaridisDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Lazaridis.Konstantinos@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0437-681X
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Dissecting the pathogenesis and outcomes of PSC using multi-omics by studying the exposome and genomeRC2DK118619 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LAZARIDIS, KONSTANTINOS N · 2018 to 2022
$7.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS RC2 DK118619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients have a risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Establishing predictive models for CCA in PSC is important.

methodsIn a large cohort of 1,459 PSC patients seen at Mayo Clinic (1993-2020), we quantified the impact of clinical/laboratory variables on CCA development using univariate and multivariate Cox models and predicted CCA using statistical and artificial intelligence (AI) approaches. We explored plasma bile acid (BA) levels' predictive power of CCA (subset of 300 patients, BA cohort).

resultsEight significant risk factors (false discovery rate: 20%) were identified with univariate analysis; prolonged inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was the most important one. IBD duration, PSC duration, and total bilirubin remained significant (p < 0.05) with multivariate analysis. Clinical/laboratory variables predicted CCA with cross-validated C-indexes of 0.68-0.71 at different time points of disease, significantly better compared to commonly used PSC risk scores. Lower chenodeoxycholic acid, higher conjugated fraction of lithocholic acid and hyodeoxycholic acid, and higher ratio of cholic acid to chenodeoxycholic acid were predictive of CCA. BAs predicted CCA with a cross-validated C-index of 0.66 (std: 0.11, BA cohort), similar to clinical/laboratory variables (C-index = 0.64, std: 0.11, BA cohort). Combining BAs with clinical/laboratory variables leads to the best average C-index of 0.67 (std: 0.13, BA cohort).

conclusionsIn a large PSC cohort, we identified clinical and laboratory risk factors for CCA development and demonstrated the first AI based predictive models that performed significantly better than commonly used PSC risk scores. More predictive data modalities are needed for clinical adoption of these models.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaCholangitis, SclerosingArtificial IntelligenceBile Ducts, IntrahepaticChenodeoxycholic AcidHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesChenodeoxycholic AcidArtificial intelligenceBile acidsCholangiocarcinomaPrimary sclerosing cholangitisRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37076803
PMCPMC10114387
OpenAlexW4366412090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.