Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37076633›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Predicting postoperative facial nerve paralysis by using intraoperative nerve monitoring during parotid surgery.

Masaaki Higashino, Ichita Kinoshita, Tsuyoshi Jinnin, Tetsuya Terada, Ryo Kawata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masaaki HigashinoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. masaaki.higashino@ompu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9905-5102
Ichita KinoshitaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Tsuyoshi JinninDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Tetsuya TeradaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Ryo KawataDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate a method for predicting postoperative facial nerve paralysis (POFNP) during parotid surgery using intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM).

methodsWe assessed prediction for POFNP by using IONM, comparing between stimulation in the facial nerve trunk and each branch by using facial nerve monitoring. The amplitude response ratio (ARR) was calculated for the trunk/periphery. In addition, we then examined the correlation between ARR and time to recovery of paralyzed branches.

results372 branches of 93 patients did not develop POFNP and were classified as group A. Among 20 patients who developed POFNP, 51 branches without POFNP were classified as group B, and 29 branches with POFNP were classified as group C. The ARR was approximately 1 in group A and B. but less than 0.5 in all branches in Group C. When the cut off value of ARR was set at 0.55, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of POFNP diagnosis by ARR were 96.5%, 93.1%, and 96.8%, respectively.

conclusionUsing IONM during parotid surgery enables easy prediction of POFNP.

Indexed as

Bell PalsyFacial Nerve InjuriesFacial ParalysisParotid NeoplasmsFacial NerveHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeParotid GlandPostoperative ComplicationsAmplitude response ratioIntraoperative nerve monitoringParotid surgeryPostoperative facial nerve paralysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.