Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37076578›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

A framework for focal and connectomic mapping of transiently disrupted brain function.

Michael S Elmalem, Hanna Moody, James K Ruffle, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Patrick Haggard, Beate Diehl, Parashkev Nachev, Ashwani Jha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Graphs and the idiographic brain.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024
    Article
  4. Brain tumour genetic network signatures of survival.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael S ElmalemUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. michael.elmalem@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6191-9809
Hanna MoodyUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
James K RuffleUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-7203
Michel Thiebaut de SchottenGroupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénérative, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0329-1814
Patrick HaggardUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, UK.
Beate DiehlUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Parashkev NachevUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. p.nachev@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-4423
Ashwani JhaUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. ashwani.jha@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-6837
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBInstitute of Ophthalmology · MXQueen Mary University of London · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GBUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/X00046X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 213038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distributed nature of the neural substrate, and the difficulty of establishing necessity from correlative data, combine to render the mapping of brain function a far harder task than it seems. Methods capable of combining connective anatomical information with focal disruption of function are needed to disambiguate local from global neural dependence, and critical from merely coincidental activity. Here we present a comprehensive framework for focal and connective spatial inference based on sparse disruptive data, and demonstrate its application in the context of transient direct electrical stimulation of the human medial frontal wall during the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with focal epilepsy. Our framework formalizes voxel-wise mass-univariate inference on sparsely sampled data within the statistical parametric mapping framework, encompassing the analysis of distributed maps defined by any criterion of connectivity. Applied to the medial frontal wall, this transient dysconnectome approach reveals marked discrepancies between local and distributed associations of major categories of motor and sensory behaviour, revealing differentiation by remote connectivity to which purely local analysis is blind. Our framework enables disruptive mapping of the human brain based on sparsely sampled data with minimal spatial assumptions, good statistical efficiency, flexible model formulation, and explicit comparison of local and distributed effects.

Indexed as

ConnectomeEpilepsies, PartialBrainElectric StimulationHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID37076578
PMCPMC10115870
OpenAlexW4366390697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.