Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37076524›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Clinical outcomes after a single induction dose of etomidate versus ketamine for emergency department sepsis intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Winchana Srivilaithon, Atidtaya Bumrungphanithaworn, Kiattichai Daorattanachai, Chitlada Limjindaporn, Kumpol Amnuaypattanapon, Intanon Imsuwan, Nipon Diskumpon, Ittabud Dasanadeba, Yaowapha Siripakarn, Thosapol Ueamsaranworakul and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shock in the post-operative ICU: the etomidate enigma.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025
    Article
  15. Evidence-based Emergency Tracheal Intubation.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An Expiration Date for Etomidate?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Winchana SrivilaithonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. winchanas@gmail.com.
Atidtaya BumrungphanithawornDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Kiattichai DaorattanachaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Chitlada LimjindapornDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Kumpol AmnuaypattanaponDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Intanon ImsuwanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Nipon DiskumponDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Ittabud DasanadebaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Yaowapha SiripakarnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Thosapol UeamsaranworakulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Chatchanan PornpanitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Phahon Yothin Road, Klong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Vanussarin PornpacharaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thammasat University · THRajavithi Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with sepsis often require emergency intubation. In emergency departments (EDs), rapid-sequence intubation with a single-dose induction agent is standard practice, but the best choice of induction agent in sepsis remains controversial. We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial in the ED. We included septic patients who were aged at least 18 years and required sedation for emergency intubation. Patients were randomly assigned by a blocked randomization to receive 0.2-0.3 mg/kg of etomidate or 1-2 mg/kg of ketamine for intubation. The objectives were to compare the survival outcomes and adverse events after intubation between etomidate and ketamine. Two hundred and sixty septic patients were enrolled; 130 patients/drug arm whose baseline characteristics were well balanced at baseline. In the etomidate group, 105 patients (80.8%) were alive at 28 days, compared with 95 patients (73.1%) in the ketamine group (risk difference [RD], 7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 2.5 to 17.9%; P = 0.092). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who survived at 24 h (91.5% vs. 96.2%; P = 0.097) and survived at 7 days (87.7% vs. 87.7%; P = 0.574). A significantly higher proportion of the etomidate group needed a vasopressor within 24 h after intubation: 43.9% vs. 17.7%, RD, 26.2% (95% CI, 15.4 to 36.9%; P < 0.001). In conclusion, there were no differences in early and late survival rates between etomidate and ketamine. However, etomidate was associated with higher risks of early vasopressor use after intubation. Trial registration: The trial protocol was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (identification number: TCTR20210213001). Registered 13 February 2021-Retrospectively registered, https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/export/pdf/TCTR20210213001 .

Indexed as

EtomidateKetamineSepsisAdolescentAdultAnesthetics, IntravenousEmergency Service, HospitalHumansIntubation, IntratrachealSingle-Blind MethodVasoconstrictor AgentsAnesthetics, IntravenousEtomidateKetamineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID37076524
PMCPMC10115773
OpenAlexW4366390423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.