Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37075511›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2023

The effect of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) on neuropsychiatric and psychosocial outcomes in drug-resistant epilepsy.

Dale Tager, Deepa Panjeti-Moore, Jimmy C Yang, Angelica Rivera-Cruz, David W Loring, Ekaterina Staikova, Cady Block, Katie L Bullinger, Andres A Rodriguez-Ruiz, Brian T Cabaniss and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dale TagerDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Deepa Panjeti-MooreDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Neurology Consultants of Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jimmy C YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Angelica Rivera-CruzDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
David W LoringDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ekaterina StaikovaDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cady BlockDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Katie L BullingerDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andres A Rodriguez-RuizDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brian T CabanissDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniel WinkelDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jon T WillieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Robert E GrossDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniel L DraneDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: ddrane@emory.edu.
Ioannis KarakisDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: ioannis.karakis@emory.edu.
Emory University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Washington · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

National Neuropsychological Network (NNN)R01MH118514 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DANIEL L DRANE, David W. Loring · 2019 to 2026
$9.4M
Dissecting the Cognitive Roles of Hippocampus, Other Temporal Lobe StructuresR01NS088748 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRANE, DANIEL L · 2014 to 2024
$6.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118514NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe impact of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) on neuropsychiatric and psychosocial outcomes has not been extensively evaluated outside of the original clinical trials and post-approval studies. The goal of this study was to ascertain the potential real-world effects of RNS on cognitive, psychiatric, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in relation to seizure outcomes by examining 50 patients undergoing RNS implantation for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients treated at our institution with RNS for DRE with at least 12 months of follow-up. In addition to baseline demographic and disease-related characteristics, we collected cognitive (Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient, Verbal Comprehension, and Perceptual Reasoning Index), psychiatric (Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventory Scores), and QOL (QOLIE-31) outcomes at 6 and 12 months after RNS implantation and correlated them with seizure outcomes.

resultsFifty patients (median age 39.5 years, 64% female) were treated with RNS for DRE in our institution from 2005 to 2020. Of the 37 of them who had well-documented pre and post-implantation seizure diaries, the 6-month median seizure frequency reduction was 88%, the response rate (50% or greater seizure frequency reduction) was 78%, and 32% of patients were free of disabling seizures in this timeframe. There was no statistically significant difference at a group level in any of the evaluated cognitive, psychiatric, and QOL outcomes at 6 and 12 months post-implantation compared to the pre-implantation baseline, irrespective of seizure outcomes, although a subset of patients experienced a decline in mood or cognitive variables. SIGNIFICANCE: Responsive neurostimulation does not appear to have a statistically significant negative or positive impact on neuropsychiatric and psychosocial status at the group level. We observed significant variability in outcome, with a minority of patients experiencing worse behavioral outcomes, which seemed related to RNS implantation. Careful outcome monitoring is required to identify the subset of patients experiencing a poor response and to make appropriate adjustments in care.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSeizuresTreatment OutcomeAnxietyDepressionEpilepsyNeuromodulationQuality of lifeResponsive Neurostimulation

Identifiers

PMID37075511
PMCPMC10314372
OpenAlexW4366155378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.